Recording Enhancements Pack

[Mmmm]

I'm not 100% sure the H100 can wake on power, can it?

Wouldn't the optimal solution be to turn off any un-necessary hardware, and slow the CPU down to the minimum speed during whatever countdown?

So you could set it to like, 18 hours, and during that time, until maybe 10 seconds before recording, it's in absolute lowest power mode, then it wakes, wakes all hardware, and prepares to record, then goes.

By 'then goes' do you mean then the battery runs out?

[Llorean]

If you turn off all unnecessary hardware and idle the core at 11 mhz you can probably get a good amount of time.

[Mmmm]

Real-time track splitter with filename view is now in CVS...

[harpster]

I'm a bit confused now as to which Rockbox to download for ideal recording. I've got Mmmm's build from the first post of this topic which I downloaded a few weeks ago. I've been pleased with it. Has that been updated lately? Or, now that some of it is being commited to the CVS, should I download the latest CVS build? Or should I leave well-enough alone and use what I've got?

[Mmmm]

CVS doesn't contain everything in the REP yet and I haven't updated my build either so you're probably better off sticking with what you've got until I update, unless there is a new feature added to CVS that you want more than what's in the REP.

[Rincewind]

Mmmm, if you consider commiting my record button configuration patch, please wait, I want to clean it up a little bit first.
Unfortunately I don't have much time now, takes possibly 2 weeks until I get round to do it.

[Mmmm]

Mmmm, if you consider commiting my record button configuration patch, please wait, I want to clean it up a little bit first.
Unfortunately I don't have much time now, takes possibly 2 weeks until I get round to do it.

Don't worry... it needs cleaning up a bit before it is committed

I'm not sure on the general opinion (in dev world) about the use of the record button yet so I think it may take a bit of discussion there first anyway!

[Llorean]

I think the general idea is that buttons shouldn't be configurable.
Definitely *all* buttons shouldn't be, because then you can accidentally remove the ability to configure them by changing them too far. At the very least many need to be hard-coded for specific screens.

And in my opinion having one button configurable (especially one with a suggested purpose such as Record) leads to the idea that all of them could be.

I kinda think short-record should go to the recording screen, and long-record, well, we need to come up with something.

Note: These are my personal opinions, and the only part that has come from others is that "We should not allow all buttons to be configurable"

[Rincewind]

And in my opinion having one button configurable (especially one with a suggested purpose such as Record) leads to the idea that all of them could be.

I kinda think short-record should go to the recording screen, and long-record, well, we need to come up with something.

Note: These are my personal opinions, and the only part that has come from others is that "We should not allow all buttons to be configurable"

short press of rec to go to recording screen isn't good imho, because if press it accidentally your playback stops etc.

I disagree with you that every button should be hardcoded. Of course almost all buttons have to be fixed so that rockbox can operate, but on units that have extra buttons, why not make them optional to use?
The opinions of how the rec button should be used differ so wildly that I think that everybody is happy if he can choose how he wants to use it.

I don't want to be able to change every button in rockbox on the fly, but it is nice to have a short cut that you can customize.

On your argument "if we do this, users want to have that", that applies to every feature that is added to rockbox.

I make a discussion thread with a poll, so that we can disuss the REP here again.

[Shindig]

Is there a way to modify the vu meter's width? It'd be nice if dB numbers were added too, from -20 to +3, for example. 

Edit: The iriver firmware has a feature that let's one do voice activated recordings. Also known as VOX, is there a way this feature could be implemented into this patch. I'd be more than happy to contribute in any way I can.

[Techy_Bloke]

that would be handy...

also is there a DB meter as a plugin usuing the internal mic ?? - how accurate is it if ther is such a thing ?

[paulheu]

I guess there will be a new patch shortly due to the recent additions to CVS?

[Mmmm]

I guess there will be a new patch shortly due to the recent additions to CVS?

I must admit that I am in the process of completely destroying the REP by committing it all... ahhh haah haaa haah haaa....

umm yeah.... now that I think I have committed all the REP I'm going to commit, I might make a new patch. Or I might start looking at AGC while Petur's away

[paulheu]

I guess there will be a new patch shortly due to the recent additions to CVS?

Any news here? 

[pupil]

I guess there will be a new patch shortly due to the recent additions to CVS?

I must admit that I am in the process of completely destroying the REP by committing it all... ahhh haah haaa haah haaa....

umm yeah.... now that I think I have committed all the REP I'm going to commit, I might make a new patch. Or I might start looking at AGC while Petur's away

Have you managed to commit all of the REP components to CVS yet Mmmm? I'm holding off from using the current CVS untill things like AGC/Histogram etc are commited, but am really looking forward to get to try out the other new CVS features since I haven't updated since April.