Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
translations translations
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Thank You for your continued support and contributions!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox Development
| |-+  Feature Ideas
| | |-+  more volume
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: more volume  (Read 9375 times)

Offline peter_s_d

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
more volume
« on: July 04, 2008, 10:44:49 AM »
Could the maximum volume be increased by a few dB?  . 

I realise that we do not want to deafen users, but I find that some tracks are too quiet for me against moderate background noise.  If it is relevant I am using a Sansa E200. 

Would it be possible to detect loud tracks and/or peak volume so that the stupid would be protected from themselves?    Allowing a maximum volume of say +10dB with an over volume protection could be an improvement. 
Logged

Offline saratoga

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9370
Re: more volume
« Reply #1 on: July 04, 2008, 10:46:53 AM »
Volume is determined by the hardware.

Also, gain above 0dB introduce distortion.  If the target actually supported +10dB, its unlikely you'd like what you heard at that volume.  Get more sensitive headphones, an amplifier, or a louder mp3 player if you need more volume.
Logged

Offline GodEater

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2829
Re: more volume
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2008, 11:03:22 AM »
Or invest in replaygain on your quiet tracks.
Logged

Read The Manual Please

Offline terrence1019

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 128
Re: more volume
« Reply #3 on: July 04, 2008, 08:47:06 PM »
Quote from: saratoga on July 04, 2008, 10:46:53 AM
Volume is determined by the hardware.

Also, gain above 0dB introduce distortion. 

Not to mention hearing loss
Logged

Offline saanaito

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 354
  • Joni Carr
    • Twitter account
Re: more volume
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2008, 11:39:36 AM »
Quote from: saratoga on July 04, 2008, 10:46:53 AM
Volume is determined by the hardware.

Also, gain above 0dB introduce distortion.  If the target actually supported +10dB, its unlikely you'd like what you heard at that volume.

Distortion is less noticeable on a bus. :)
Logged
Rockbox: Sansa Clip Zip, iPod Color, iRiver H320

Android: Moto X4, Galaxy Tab S2 T710

Offline soap

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1679
  • Creature of habit.
Re: more volume
« Reply #5 on: July 05, 2008, 11:50:12 AM »
A habit of turning up the volume in response to background noise is the quickest recipe for hearing loss through DAP usage I can think of.

The proper solution is either to give your ears a rest when in noisy environments or invest in noise isolating or canceling headphones.

As for loud track or loud peak detection, this is impossible.  There are many factors involved in the amount of energy which reaches your eardrum, and many of them (including headphone choice, headphone fit, and ear shape) are out of the control sphere of the DAP itself.
Logged
Rockbox Forum Guidelines
The Rockbox Manual
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way

Offline peter_s_d

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: more volume
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2008, 09:32:44 AM »
I was thinking about noise cancelling earplugs anyway. 

The tracks that I am interested in are spoken voice files that I listen to once and delete, so prepossessing them would be tedious - and well beyond what my father could do. 

If it were known that some DAPs are louder than others, could just the quiet models be tweaked? 

<optimism mode>

Is volume compression possible?  Have you ever heard a cassette tape that has been recorded with dbx and played back without it?

That would keep the peak down to avoid hearing loss, but get the quiet voices over the noise floor. 

<end optimism> 

<outrageous optimism mode>

Could models with a microphone detect noisy environments and dynamically control the volume compression factor? 

<end outrageous optimism> 
Logged

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: more volume
« Reply #7 on: July 06, 2008, 10:16:07 AM »
<realism>
Could the user just manually adjust the EQ to bring up frequencies that tend to be quieter, and save that config for later use on other voice files?
<end realism>
Logged

Offline saanaito

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 354
  • Joni Carr
    • Twitter account
Re: more volume
« Reply #8 on: July 06, 2008, 01:32:06 PM »
What about movies in the MPEG player? Most of my movies' soundtracks are at a ridiculously low volume, such that I can barely hear them - even in a quiet area - at my normal "music volume" (-30). In a car, they're impossible to hear even at +6.

My computer takes nearly a full day to process one movie, so going back to pump up the source volume is practically NOT an option anymore. :(
Logged
Rockbox: Sansa Clip Zip, iPod Color, iRiver H320

Android: Moto X4, Galaxy Tab S2 T710

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: more volume
« Reply #9 on: July 06, 2008, 01:59:53 PM »
You can reencode movies while copying the video stream much, MUCH more quickly. As well, the equalizer works for them too.
Logged

Offline peter_s_d

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: more volume
« Reply #10 on: July 07, 2008, 12:36:04 AM »
O.K.  It looks like using the equaliser is the way to go at the moment.  There is an extra 24dB available! 

Is bumping the gain evenly in all frequency ranges *exactly* the same as increasing the volume by the same amount?  Nearly as good?  Or only a rough approximation?  I am not an audiophile and I am not listening to classical music, so the likely answer is, "You won't be able to tell the difference.". 

If you are really serious about protecting the stupid from themselves (an impossible task) then it would be better to limit the combination of volume + equaliser, rather than limit each individually. 
Logged

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: more volume
« Reply #11 on: July 07, 2008, 12:49:17 AM »
It's not an issue of "protecting the stupid." The volume range is defined by the hardware. It already gets well louder than is often safe for the ears, but the amount provided is always the full volume range of the chip. Any additional loudness would have to be added digitally. Because of that it's exactly identical to what you'd get by increasing it with replaygain or a pre-amp.
Logged

Offline Zardoz

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 226
Re: more volume
« Reply #12 on: July 07, 2008, 01:24:21 PM »
I suggest using in-ear phones with a good fit, for better low frequency response and less 'attenuation' of the higher ends. maybe you already do? tuppence worth
« Last Edit: July 11, 2008, 12:18:51 PM by Zardoz »
Logged
"And I have looked into the face of the force which put the idea in your head. You are bred and led yourself"

  • Print
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox Development
| |-+  Feature Ideas
| | |-+  more volume
 

  • SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.09 seconds with 20 queries.