Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
translations translations
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Welcome to the Rockbox Technical Forums!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  ogg vs. mp3
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: ogg vs. mp3  (Read 7671 times)

Offline psycho_maniac

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 812
    • MyWebPage
ogg vs. mp3
« on: September 14, 2005, 01:46:13 AM »
hello which is better? ive been listeing ot mp3 most of my life and now (i finialy decided to give ogg a try. got a encoder and converetd a song ot .ogg and i cant really tell a difference.  is there really a difference? i just want to know advancements for ogg. thanks for your input
Logged
Please SEARCH the wiki | Please read the Forum Guidelines | Please Read the Manual
I Own A Gigabeat F80

Offline nobby

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 774
  • No, i can't code. :(
    • psycho-logic  (my CSS clan)
Re: ogg vs. mp3
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2005, 03:19:22 AM »
the benefit of ogg is transparency (ie, it seems cd quality to you) at a lower bitrate, and thus a smaller file. If you don't need the space, stick with mp3 for compatibility and battery life. (ogg takes more cpu time to decode, thus draining the battery slightly faster)
Logged
[size=0]-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12 (www.geekcode.net)
GU d- s:+ a--- C++++>$ P+  L++>++++ E- W+++>$
N? o? K? w+ O- M- V? PS+ PE- Y PGP- t+@ 5- X++ R+ tv-@ b+ DI++++ D++ G e* h! r-- y?   ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------[/size]

Offline Assimalyst

  • Artist
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 351
  • Cluck
Re: ogg vs. mp3
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2005, 04:52:11 AM »
You shouldn't convert MP3's to OGG, they're both lossy codecs, thus you lose some quality converting to mp3, then lose more converting to ogg.

If you're encoding into any lossy codec always encode straight from the original, full quality, source.
Logged
Smack ma goblin!

Offline kenshin

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 360
  • IRC Nick: kenshin
Re: ogg vs. mp3
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2005, 01:40:39 PM »
Ogg Vorbis is also a completely open codec. There are no patents held by anyone, if that's at all important to you, ... Also, if you have need for gapless it's native in Ogg while in MP3 only a LAME encoder hack can achieve gapless (AFAIK, I only use Ogg Vorbis). Ogg Vorbis comments are a little more flexible than the ID3 tags you find in MP3 files.
Logged
kenshin/kawika/sithia

Offline nobby

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 774
  • No, i can't code. :(
    • psycho-logic  (my CSS clan)
Re: ogg vs. mp3
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2005, 04:17:13 PM »
ogg = better
mp3 = more compatible

simple as that.
Logged
[size=0]-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12 (www.geekcode.net)
GU d- s:+ a--- C++++>$ P+  L++>++++ E- W+++>$
N? o? K? w+ O- M- V? PS+ PE- Y PGP- t+@ 5- X++ R+ tv-@ b+ DI++++ D++ G e* h! r-- y?   ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------[/size]

Offline Road Runner

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 73
Re: ogg vs. mp3
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2005, 05:06:40 PM »
WOW! the amazing search option has done it again! (that would be google)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorbis#Codec_comparisons


Ogg sounds better. One of the important things is the coder cuts less of the bass, So it sounds better. read about it. I only code to ogg but it really drains battery on the player  :(
Logged

Offline kenshin

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 360
  • IRC Nick: kenshin
Re: ogg vs. mp3
« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2005, 12:51:26 AM »
Quote from: Road Runner on September 17, 2005, 05:06:40 PM
I only code to ogg but it really drains battery on the player :(

Even at the expense of more costly decoding I still regularly get over 10 hours of playback when switching back and forth between Ogg and FLAC.
Logged
kenshin/kawika/sithia

Offline Road Runner

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 73
Re: ogg vs. mp3
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2005, 07:05:25 AM »
Well, I don't.

Maybe I do, anyhow, it feels very short, but I can't complain because there are so much options in rockbox that I almost never just play songs. about a week ago I've made a serious battery test playing on the iriver firmware an mp3 directory coded at about 112~128 kbps, the battery lasted  for more then 16 hours, and i've had the player for about two years now (!)
Logged

Offline wrecker

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34
Re: ogg vs. mp3
« Reply #8 on: September 24, 2005, 07:01:56 PM »
I tested fully the other day a got just under 17 hours playing mostly 192kbps MP3s.

I've no OGG files though, so can't really compare and can't be bothered to convert them all!
Logged
far out man...

  • Print
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  ogg vs. mp3
 

  • SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.095 seconds with 20 queries.