Rockbox Development > Starting Development and Compiling

Compile error - make[2]: *** No rule to make target `libspeex/speex/ogg.h

(1/3) > >>

Flake_8:
I tried compiling rockbox from source over the last few days. I have had several compile errors after "make" depending on the daily build date. I tried reinstalling cygwin based on the "How To Compile" Wiki and am still getting the same errors.

For the latest daily build (2007-02-11) I get the following error after configure, and make for iaudio X5:

OBJCOPY aiff.codec
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `libspeex/speex/ogg.h', needed by `/home/User/rockbox/build/apps/codecs/speex.o'.  Stop.
rm /home/User/rockbox/build/apps/codecs/codec_crt0.o
make[1]: *** [build-codecs] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2


For the daily builds for 2-8, 2-9, and 2-10 I get the following error after configure and make:

CC bookmark.c
In file included from bookmark.c:38:
recorder/icons.h:28:25: rockboxlogo.h: No such file or directory
recorder/icons.h:30:32: remote_rockboxlogo.h: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [/home/User/rockbox-20070210/build/apps/bookmark.o] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2

The daily build for 2-7 works fine. Are these types of compile errors common from day to day or is there something I am doing wrong?

Llorean:
Try using SVN to check out the sources, rather than trying to build from the daily archive. It's not uncommon that when the source tree changes the script that makes the archive will fail to include everything.

If you actually use SVN as is suggested you'll never have this problem.

safetydan:
Also, if you're using the same build directory, make sure you do a "make clean" before building again. This might clear the error for you.

bluebrother:
Also, sometimes there are changes to the configure script that require you to re-run it. At least for the sim there was such a change recently (caused by the inclusion of speex). If in doubt try rerunning configure, at least it won't hurt.

Flake_8:
Thanks for the tips. Using SVN fixed all the problems.
For some reason I had thought that the daily builds were more stable than the very latest svn build, but I can see I misunderstood how the versioning system works.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page