Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Welcome to the Rockbox Technical Forums!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox Development
| |-+  Starting Development and Compiling
| | |-+  arm-elf-gcc problem
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: arm-elf-gcc problem  (Read 6067 times)

Offline bluebrother

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3421
  • creature
Re: arm-elf-gcc problem
« Reply #15 on: January 07, 2007, 05:31:18 AM »
why aren't you guys just using the vmware image? It's linux and that behaves pretty similar to cygwin. As this image is available I personally don't see a reason to use cygwin for that anymore (except if you already have it up an running).
Logged
Rockbox Utility development binaries (updated infrequently) · How to ask questions the smart way · We do not estimate timeframes.

Offline Sentertainment

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: arm-elf-gcc problem
« Reply #16 on: January 07, 2007, 12:07:36 PM »
Quote from: bluebrother on January 07, 2007, 05:31:18 AM
why aren't you guys just using the vmware image? It's linux and that behaves pretty similar to cygwin. As this image is available I personally don't see a reason to use cygwin for that anymore (except if you already have it up an running).

I prefer running things natively ;)
Logged

Offline bluebrother

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3421
  • creature
Re: arm-elf-gcc problem
« Reply #17 on: January 07, 2007, 12:47:14 PM »
Quote from: Sentertainment on January 07, 2007, 12:07:36 PM
I prefer running things natively ;)
cygwin is not native :D
Logged
Rockbox Utility development binaries (updated infrequently) · How to ask questions the smart way · We do not estimate timeframes.

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: arm-elf-gcc problem
« Reply #18 on: January 07, 2007, 04:44:25 PM »
I'd say the whole argument between VMWare and Cygwin is this:

VMWare:
Pro: Easy Setup, Compiling takes ~half the time.
Con: Takes up a lot of disk space. Sometimes unreliable network access to the files.

Cygwin:
Pro: Smaller footprint on disk space. Easier to access your files.
Con: Setup can go wrong in a myriad of ways. Compiling is measured in decades rather than minutes.


Okay, so I'm exaggerating very slightly on that final point, but it's really Space and direct filesystem access vs Speed and ease of setup.
Logged

Offline Sentertainment

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Re: arm-elf-gcc problem
« Reply #19 on: January 07, 2007, 10:06:40 PM »
Quote from: bluebrother on January 07, 2007, 12:47:14 PM
Quote from: Sentertainment on January 07, 2007, 12:07:36 PM
I prefer running things natively ;)
cygwin is not native :D

I thought only the command line was simulated...
It seems to be UNIX for DOS to me.
Logged

Offline GodEater

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2829
Re: arm-elf-gcc problem
« Reply #20 on: January 08, 2007, 03:36:13 AM »
Quote from: Sentertainment on January 07, 2007, 10:06:40 PM
I thought only the command line was simulated...
It seems to be UNIX for DOS to me.

Cygwin is a POSIX compatibility layer for Windows. This means that all the binaries that run in the cygwin environment get a lot of their API calls routed through the cygwin.dll which then has to translate them into windows calls. That's why it's not "native".
Logged

Read The Manual Please

  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox Development
| |-+  Starting Development and Compiling
| | |-+  arm-elf-gcc problem
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.08 seconds with 14 queries.