Rockbox Development > New Ports
SanDisk Sansa m200 series (v1)
skaos:
--- Quote ---That's the one I call "v2", and it uses AS3525.
--- End quote ---
Wouldn't it be better to call it m200-v4 to avoid any confusion?
I have downloaded firmware 1.3.0, 2.2.5, 4.0.44 and 4.1.08 (from http://files.zefie.com/PMP/sansa/m200/firmware/) and I would guess that there are four hardware versions as well. To my untrained eye 1.3.0 and 2.2.5 looks similar and from the RB wiki they probably use Telechips. The two latter firmware includes an "AS3525" string. I haven't found any 3.x.x firmware.
GodEater:
--- Quote from: skaos on November 26, 2007, 08:10:59 AM ---
--- Quote ---That's the one I call "v2", and it uses AS3525.
--- End quote ---
Wouldn't it be better to call it m200-v4 to avoid any confusion?
--- End quote ---
Bagder is referring to the hardware version - not the firmware it's running.
skaos:
I know - there are most likely four hardware revisions/versions of this player as discussed at abi:
http://www.anythingbutipod.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8031
http://www.anythingbutipod.com/forum/showpost.php?p=39607&postcount=2
Silkscreen markings also show v3 and v4.1 versions and I see no reason why Sandisk should use this if there weren't v1 and v2 as well:
v4.1: http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/pub/Main/SansaM200Port/m240back.jpg
v3.0: http://medlem.spray.se/trancentral/sansa1.jpg, http://medlem.spray.se/trancentral/sansa2.jpg
It seems likely that the major firmware version for many (most/all?) Sansa players are linked to hardware revisions/versions.
Anyway, this is pretty academic as long as there is no AS3525 port yet (and I guess that the developers would start with the e200-v2).
alsaf:
Apologies in advance if I'm getting above myself here.
Would I be right in saying that arm-elf can still be used with the AS3525?
Bagder:
--- Quote ---Would I be right in saying that arm-elf can still be used with the AS3525?
--- End quote ---
yes
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version