Support and General Use > Hardware
RMAA run on the Nano 2G vs Nano 1G
julio:
Ok, thank you, i'm gonna test that right now !!
For the wav file, which type do you recommend ?
EDIT: I think iPod does not support wav file :s
breez:
Use Apple Lossless instead.
julio:
Yes, so i tried but i have a problem of sound level input....
Infact it is not so important, i will use the one of sigsegv0x0B...
Just a question, these statisitics of RMAA made by sigsegv0x0B prove that Nano 2G has almost the same sound quality as Nano 1G, doesn't it ?
breez:
--- Quote from: julio on November 12, 2006, 08:04:46 AM ---Just a question, these statisitics of RMAA made by sigsegv0x0B prove that Nano 2G has almost the same sound quality as Nano 1G, doesn't it ?
--- End quote ---
It looks like the distortion figures are worse for 2G Nano under low impedance load.
Judging by the noise levels this test was run pretty much at full volume. The output stage may not be well suited for driving low impedance loads at such high voltage levels (too much current). I suggest running tests again at a lower volume level. Maybe use a volume level which is only moderately loud with the headphones used.
julio:
I can't manage running this test well...
i put a cable between the line out of my iPod and the line in (mic) of my computer, and then i use the "record only" option of RMAA with the test file generated by RMAA (Signal test 44khz 16 bit...). But the problem is that RMAA always says the line in volume is too low or too high ... so i can't manage having good results, my statistics are awful...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version