Rockbox Ports are now being developed for various digital audio players!
Well, Rockbox is more a "project" than a "product" in my mind at least. I think the goal is to grow the contributor base, rather than the install base. It's a community thing.
I can only assume you mean the few tools that are used for installing Rockbox for certain players, such as fwpatcher.exe or ipodpatcher.exe.
To clarify: I am not angry. I just find your post lacking clarity because you seem to not be very clear on what data should or shouldn't be needed by most users, or why we have the additional data set up as a wiki, or even what files could even reasonably have their own download link.
Still, if the project ever gets to a point where it wants to widen the user base, some site reorganization might be in order.
And yes, I'm still not clear on why can't some files have a separate link in "Downloads" section and what's wrong with the way I suggested to organize documents.
The UISimulator is compiled from the official source package. EZWPS is not an official tool, and until it becomes one, directly linking it from the downloads section would be a bad idea as it implies official support that is not actually offered.Are you saying you dont understand why I object to putting files that are already available from the daily build page as their own seperate links, or why I'm objecting to unofficial files being included as seperate links?Any time a user is IN the wiki, they should clearly know that they are in the wiki, which means much/all of the information provided may be written by other users like them. It is not necessarily official, or even accurate, and should they have problems with it they are able to fix it themselves.
There is a distinct difference between static information (the manual) and dynamic content (the wiki) and this is part of the reason I feel it is quite important that they stay differentiated.
Page created in 0.114 seconds with 21 queries.