Support and General Use > User Interface and Voice
Menu reworking
Mr. Brownstone:
I think having "Bass" and "Treble" options right next to "EQ" is a bit redundant.
Indeed, there are about four ways of modifying the EQ and they all achieve the same objective.
So I guess this is a vote for a little less duplication. ;D
Febs:
The EQ is software based, while the 'bass' and 'treble' controls are hardware based, so these settings really control different things.
Mad Big Sausage:
Just a quick note without any extra opinion.
What are deemed to be the most important features are at the top so it takes a few button presses to get to them.
Yes?
So the single most important option is #1 at the top, the second most important #2, the third at #3, the fouth #4 and so on till we get to the least used feature right at the bottom.
The first entry can be reached without any up/down presses, the second and last by 1 press, the third and second last by two.
Couldn't the less used entries be located somewhere in the middle of the list?
mnhnhyouh:
I would chip in here to support the option to config the menu structure....
h
Llorean:
From my understanding there are a host of complications that could come with this regarding properly voicing and localizing a configurable menu.
I'm sure they can all be resolved, but is there really *that* much benefit to such a thing considering both the work, added complexity to rockbox (including likely increased size, very bad for the archos targets, and increased bugginess for a long time) of such a feature?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version