Installation / Removal > Other - Installation/Removal
Issues installing Rockbox on HIFI Walker H2 v1.3
dconrad:
More information: Here's my nand info on my v1.3:
--- Code: ---readID opcode = FF 9B 12 9B
readID address = 9B 12 9B 12
readID dummy = 9B 12 9B 12
sfc params0 = 06 05 04 03
sfc params1 = 02 55 AA 55
sfc params2 = 00 5E 02 02
sfc params3 = A8 24 00 00
--- End code ---
I notice there's 3 bytes different in the sfc information...
And from my v1.6 unit:
--- Code: ---readID opcode = FF EF AA 21
readID address = EF AA 21 00
readID dummy = EF AA 21 00
sfc params0 = 06 05 04 03
sfc params1 = 02 55 AA 55
sfc params2 = 00 5E 02 02
sfc params3 = A8 24 00 00
--- End code ---
dconrad:
Ok, I would like to run a sanity check. Can you please use jztool to temporarily load this bootloader and then attempt to dump the flash info and the flash ONFI info?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wkVcvOU_fufoXPuUNrhI6dPEuuxGFrWv/view?usp=sharing
Edit:
Here is also a shot-in-the-dark change to add more delay between resetting the nand chip and trying to identify it. Can you please do the same procedure with this as well?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bHqN6USYKDhLneUl6dXAEskuEjzmSi69/view?usp=sharing
Arrefur:
I have ran the sanity_check_bootloader and got the following flash_info and again got the "NAND open failed" prompt, with an empty flash_onfi_info file.
--- Code: ---readID opcode = FF E5 71 E5
readID address = E5 71 E5 71
readID dummy = E5 71 E5 71
sfc params0 = 06 05 04 03
sfc params1 = 02 55 AA 55
sfc params2 = 00 6E 02 02
sfc params3 = A4 2F 00 00
--- End code ---
Same thing with the long_reset_delay_bootloader, got the following flash_info and the exact same problem with the flash_onfi_info file.
--- Code: ---readID opcode = FF E5 71 E5
readID address = E5 71 E5 71
readID dummy = E5 71 E5 71
sfc params0 = 06 05 04 03
sfc params1 = 02 55 AA 55
sfc params2 = 00 6E 02 02
sfc params3 = A4 2F 00 00
--- End code ---
dconrad:
Ok, no big surprise there but I had to try it. It appears that we can successfully read the flash when dumping the info, but we fail to correctly ID the chip for some reason. There are a couple of discrepancies between the two, maybe they are significant.
Let's do the same test with these two files:
second_read_bootloader.erosq: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a5lfRcoPRjX4OtIImpP5uOjQCPLk64SP/view?usp=sharing
tsh0_bootloader.erosq: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xbKolnWmISUpHl-XZVESQnx4_W-z3OuR/view?usp=sharing
Arrefur:
The flash_info files are the exact same, and the exact same problem with the flash_onfi_info file, with the "NAND open failed" prompt.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version