Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Welcome to the Rockbox Technical Forums!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  Rephrasing the Sansa Clip + Manual to Improve Clarity
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Rephrasing the Sansa Clip + Manual to Improve Clarity  (Read 1909 times)

Offline sansaclipplus

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Rephrasing the Sansa Clip + Manual to Improve Clarity
« on: October 09, 2013, 09:45:11 PM »
I recently encountered an issue with the manual install of RockBox on the Sansa Clip +. I didn't select the appropriate drive during the automatic install. You can check out my post to read more about it. It occurs to me that I wouldn't have encountered this if the Sansa Clip + manual was clearer. I'm referring to this url: http://download.rockbox.org/daily/manual/rockbox-sansaclip/rockbox-buildch2.html. More specifically, I'm referring to the following section regarding the automatic install:

"When first starting Rockbox Utility run “Autodetect”, found in the configuration dialog (File → Configure). Autodetection can detect most player types. If autodetection fails or is unable to detect the mountpoint, make sure to enter the correct values. The mountpoint indicates the location of the player in your filesystem. On Windows, this is the drive letter the player gets assigned, on other systems this is a path in the filesystem."

The sentence that I bolded for effect led me to believe that autodetection either works successfully or that it is unable to detect the mountpoint. Those are the two possibilities outlined by Rockbox regarding the Rockbox Utility configuration. I encountered a third possibility during my install using the Windows Vista OS. The device was autodetected so in my mind the configuration was successful. The mountpoint, however, remained C when in retrospect it should have been F.

Therefore, I suggest an amendment to the phrasing above to reflect this third possibility. Perhaps instead of the sentence in bold, you could say: "If autodetection fails to accurately reflect both the correct device type and mountpoint, make sure to enter the correct values."

Thanks for looking over this...
Logged

Offline [Saint]

  • Rockbox Expert
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1662
  • Hayden Pearce
    • Google+
Re: Rephrasing the Sansa Clip + Manual to Improve Clarity
« Reply #1 on: October 09, 2013, 10:57:24 PM »
One thing we certainly could guard against is the fact that under no circumstances is the install location ever going to be C:\

I'm not sure the manual text is incorrect, as it does cover the case you describe (autodetect indeed did fail). It could be clearer, though. What really should be happening is a pop-up or so, like:

"Are you sure its C:\? This almost certainly is wrong...are you really, *really* sure?"

I guess the thing that should be made clear is that the user should double check even if autodetect succeeds, as it may still be wrong.


[Saint]
Logged
Using PMs to annoy devs about bugs/patches is not a good way to have the issue looked at.

Offline AlexP

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3688
  • ex-BigBambi
Re: Rephrasing the Sansa Clip + Manual to Improve Clarity
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2013, 01:50:51 PM »
Patches welcome, to the manual or Rockbox Utility.
Logged
H140, F60, S120, e260, c240, Clip, Fuze v2, Connect, MP170, Meizu M3, Nano 1G, Android

Offline bluebrother

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3421
  • creature
Re: Rephrasing the Sansa Clip + Manual to Improve Clarity
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2013, 02:19:39 PM »
Quote from: [Saint] on October 09, 2013, 10:57:24 PM
One thing we certainly could guard against is the fact that under no circumstances is the install location ever going to be C:\

Detection in Rockbox Utility development versions has been reworked and will now skip all drives that don't contain a usable filesystem -- i.e. FAT. Since Windows uses NTFS these days this should be good enough. If anyone tries the development version (link in my signature) feel free to send me feedback about it.

Quote from: AlexP on October 10, 2013, 01:50:51 PM
Patches welcome, to the manual or Rockbox Utility.

Testers as well :)
Logged
Rockbox Utility development binaries (updated infrequently) · How to ask questions the smart way · We do not estimate timeframes.

  • Print
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  Rephrasing the Sansa Clip + Manual to Improve Clarity
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.084 seconds with 15 queries.