Support and General Use > Recording
mark tracks while recording?
whatboutbob:
I likes. Nice work Mmmm.
I've tested about 20 short file-splits (optical sine wave). All perfect seamless.
Just testing longer splits now...and splits during buffer writes...
edit: Longer file splits (after ~1hr) and splitting during buffer-writes seem to work perfectly.
The button-mapping makes sense to me. Now if we could just get a long press of the rec button to go from the wps/file screen to the recording screen... *nudge* :-)
Sorry to hijack...but this is a little on subject at least. Would anyone else apart from me find it useful to have the name of the file currently being recorded listed on the recording screen? I think it would make the file-split process a little more...err...transparent. Can't see how it would fit on the remote screen, but since Mmmm pointed out the interference it causes, I won't be using that to record any more. :-( ...and apart from that it doesn't make sense to not have something just because it wouldn' fit on a much smaller secondary screen...
Mmmm:
--- Quote from: whatboutbob on June 02, 2006, 09:42:43 PM ---I likes. Nice work Mmmm.
I've tested about 20 short file-splits (optical sine wave). All perfect seamless.
Just testing longer splits now...and splits during buffer writes...
edit: Longer file splits (after ~1hr) and splitting during buffer-writes seem to work perfectly.
--- End quote ---
Excellent, thanks for testing whatboutbob...
--- Quote ---The button-mapping makes sense to me. Now if we could just get a long press of the rec button to go from the wps/file screen to the recording screen... *nudge* :-)
Sorry to hijack...but this is a little on subject at least. Would anyone else apart from me find it useful to have the name of the file currently being recorded listed on the recording screen? I think it would make the file-split process a little more...err...transparent. Can't see how it would fit on the remote screen, but since Mmmm pointed out the interference it causes, I won't be using that to record any more. :-( ...and apart from that it doesn't make sense to not have something just because it wouldn' fit on a much smaller secondary screen...
--- End quote ---
I agree...I'll look into putting that info in later... I think it would look best just above the peakmeter, do you agree?
Hmmm have to think about what to do about the remote display though, it would be a pain to have seperate positions for everything on the remote and main unit...
Febs:
--- Quote from: whatboutbob on June 02, 2006, 09:42:43 PM ---The button-mapping makes sense to me. Now if we could just get a long press of the rec button to go from the wps/file screen to the recording screen... *nudge* :-)
--- End quote ---
x2!
And if anyone decides to do a patch for this, please consider having Play+Rec automatically go to the recording screen AND start recording.
whatboutbob:
--- Quote from: Mmmm on June 03, 2006, 05:53:17 AM ---I agree...I'll look into putting that info in later... I think it would look best just above the peakmeter, do you agree?
Hmmm have to think about what to do about the remote display though, it would be a pain to have seperate positions for everything on the remote and main unit...
--- End quote ---
I wouldn't have a problem with having the filename at the bottom of the screen. I don't think it has to be super-prominent....just there somewhere. That may make your life easier with the remote then. Alternatively, there's space next to the filesize...but that's prolly crazy talk.
--- Quote from: Febs on June 03, 2006, 06:26:31 AM ---And if anyone decides to do a patch for this, please consider having Play+Rec automatically go to the recording screen AND start recording.
--- End quote ---
Oooh...I like that.
Febs:
Yeah, I've suggested it before, and I should probably file a feature request. It should be a very intuitive button combination, considering that it's the way that tape recorders, VCRs, etc. have worked for decades.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version