Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Welcome to the Rockbox Technical Forums!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Announcements
| | |-+  3.12 release candidate builds
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: 3.12 release candidate builds  (Read 23009 times)

Offline AlexP

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3688
  • ex-BigBambi
3.12 release candidate builds
« on: August 28, 2012, 03:21:46 PM »
 Hi all,

In preparation for the upcoming release of 3.12, release candidate builds are available.

Unfortunately the current release of Rockbox Utility doesn't know what to do with them.  A new release will be made soon, but for now development builds of Rockbox Utility are available for Windows and OSX here: http://www.alice-dsl.net/dominik.riebeling/rockbox/rbutil/  Linux users will need to build it themselves.

The release candidates can also be installed manually and can be found here: http://download.rockbox.org/release-candidate/16335da/ .

Please test these and report any new bugs on flyspray.

Many thanks,

Alex
Logged
H140, F60, S120, e260, c240, Clip, Fuze v2, Connect, MP170, Meizu M3, Nano 1G, Android

Offline MasterFen

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2012, 06:07:41 AM »
Do we have a changelog?
Logged
4GB Fuzev2 (Currently having problems)
2GB Clip+ with Sandisk 4GB MicroSDHC (Class 2).

Offline bluebrother

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3528
  • creature
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2012, 07:48:27 AM »
http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/MajorChanges
Logged

Offline sportscrazed2

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2012, 02:55:39 PM »
can we expect final today?
Logged

Offline bluebrother

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3528
  • creature
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2012, 04:56:07 PM »
No
Logged

Offline sportscrazed2

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2012, 06:43:29 PM »
then soon right?  like tommorow?
Logged

Octopuss

  • Guest
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #6 on: September 10, 2012, 03:20:33 AM »
Quote from: sportscrazed2 on September 09, 2012, 06:43:29 PM
then soon right?  like tommorow?
mentally challenged? ???
Logged

Offline sportscrazed2

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 41
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #7 on: September 10, 2012, 09:09:30 AM »
Quote from: Octopuss on September 10, 2012, 03:20:33 AM
Quote from: sportscrazed2 on September 09, 2012, 06:43:29 PM
then soon right?  like tommorow?
mentally challenged? ???
no just excited geeze
Logged

Offline icheyne

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • Homepage
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2012, 11:26:16 AM »
I'm excited too.  ;D
Logged

Offline AlexP

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3688
  • ex-BigBambi
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #9 on: September 10, 2012, 02:28:28 PM »
No, not tomorrow.  See http://www.rockbox.org/mail/archive/rockbox-dev-archive-2012-09/0001.shtml
Logged
H140, F60, S120, e260, c240, Clip, Fuze v2, Connect, MP170, Meizu M3, Nano 1G, Android

Offline icheyne

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • Homepage
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2012, 04:27:57 PM »
Quality over quantity...   ::)
Logged

Offline xpmule

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 52
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #11 on: September 24, 2012, 04:01:28 PM »
No RC for Sansa Fuze+ ?
Logged

Offline bluebrother

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3528
  • creature
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #12 on: September 24, 2012, 04:07:42 PM »
Quote from: xpmule on September 24, 2012, 04:01:28 PM
No RC for Sansa Fuze+ ?

Only players in the "Stable" category get release builds, thus RC builds.
Logged

Offline xpmule

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 52
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #13 on: September 24, 2012, 11:27:03 PM »
that's what i was assuming ..sounds logical
i guess i could download the source and work on the port myself though right ?
Download the virtualbox link and take it from there ?
Only Portable i have right now is the Fuze+

I also mentioned before at the Sansa forums i coded a proof of concept
command line app that transfered albums w/Art to the player (using MTP)
It worked and all but making the full program i wanted became way too much work
so i dropped the idea but i learned a bit about the Fuze+ by using the MTP api
to poll the device for various data such as capabilities and format support etc.
I have a good 10 years experience reverse and patching in ASM and coding in c/c++
Since i started using Rockbox I've been thinking i may have a go at seeing if I can
help improve the port (bugs are reported at flyspray i think)
So far i'm just trying to absorb all this Rockbox stuff lol ..its a lot to take in
and thats a GOOD thing :)
I have used various Linux distribs over teh last decade and i have seen a lot
of talk about Rockbox many times in linux circles so i know this ain't no new project ;)

Any tips or suggestions if i wanted to compile my own Fuze+ code ? (virtualbox + windows download)
So far i have noticed one bug i think i can fix.. the program Tag&Rename and probably others
add album cover art using the format image/jpg(which fails) and many others i tried use image/jpeg(which works)
all using the same title for the cover so thats not a problem.. anyway i did some hex comparing
and used OllyDBG with Tag&Rename (windows app) to figure this all out and i bet it would be trivial to add support for both tag / image declarations (since they are both valid? it should be fixed probably)
Logged

Offline [Saint]

  • Rockbox Expert
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1662
  • Hayden Pearce
    • Google+
Re: 3.12 release candidate builds
« Reply #14 on: October 07, 2012, 08:42:31 PM »
Quote from: xpmule on September 24, 2012, 11:27:03 PM
So far i have noticed one bug i think i can fix.. the program Tag&Rename and probably others
add album cover art using the format image/jpg(which fails) and many others i tried use image/jpeg(which works)
all using the same title for the cover so thats not a problem.. anyway i did some hex comparing
and used OllyDBG with Tag&Rename (windows app) to figure this all out and i bet it would be trivial to add support for both tag / image declarations (since they are both valid? it should be fixed probably)

Sliding off-topic from the original thread, but I have to assume you'll be watching this or receiving notifications for replies here.

Our Fine Manual explains the preferential order in which album art is loaded, and the naming schemes said art may take, very well.

To quote the relevant section directly:

The order Rockbox uses when looking for a picture is as follows (a list in braces means that those file extensions are tried in that order):

1. embedded (JPEG images in ID3v2 or MP4 tags only)
2. ./filename.{jpeg,jpg,bmp}
3. ./albumtitle.{jpeg,jpg,bmp}
4. ./cover.{jpeg,jpg,bmp}
5. ./folder.jpg
6. /.rockbox/albumart/albumartist-albumtitle.{jpeg,jpg,bmp}
7. ../albumtitle.{jpeg,jpg,bmp}
8. ../cover.{jpeg,jpg,bmp}

I do hope this answers the query I will admit I had a great deal of trouble attempting to parse.


[Saint]
Logged
Using PMs to annoy devs about bugs/patches is not a good way to have the issue looked at.

  • Print
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Announcements
| | |-+  3.12 release candidate builds
 

  • SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2021, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 18 queries.