Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Rockbox Ports are now being developed for various digital audio players!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB  (Read 3222 times)

Offline jimmynova

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB
« on: July 19, 2012, 10:16:56 AM »
Love the software.  First time caller.

Have "upgraded" my last two ipods with Rockbox, primarily for FLAC support - and very happy with the results.

When my last ipod blew out, repair/replace decision appeared to lean toward replace and I picked up a new ipod classic slim 160GB.  At the time, it didn't even occur to me to check the state of Rockbox support for this model.  I just assumed...  (and please, don't.  stopped being witty decades ago.)

So - any thoughts from the devs when Rockbox for this model will be stable, usable, and non-bricking, with dual boot, and charge, and all the usual goodies?

Also - is there some way the community can support accelerating the development?  A bonus pool or user-sponsored pizza and Red Bull codeathon / testathon?  Anything?

I brought over most of my CD collection to FLAC and am ideologically opposed to downsampling to mp3 or crosscoding to ALAC, particularly when Rockbox for classic could go "gold" any day now.  That and not a huge fan of iTunes.

So - when's it expected and can I / we encourage/motivate/bribe the devs to roll it out sooner?
Logged

Offline AlexP

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3688
  • ex-BigBambi
Re: State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2012, 06:19:57 PM »
When someone does the work, and it can be accelerated by doing the work.  As far as I'm aware nobody is specifically working on it right now.
Logged
H140, F60, S120, e260, c240, Clip, Fuze v2, Connect, MP170, Meizu M3, Nano 1G, Android

Offline jimmynova

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2012, 07:15:01 PM »
What can we, in the community do - lacking coding skills to put our own hands to the task - to encourage the devs to set aside the demands of their homes, families, and paying vocations to attend to my pressing F.W.P. that there isn't a stable release of Rockbox for my shiny new and capacious ipod?   :'(
Logged

Offline wodz

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 390
Re: State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2012, 03:07:03 AM »
Thats wrong perspective. Do what I did - I learned how to dissasemble, learned new instruction set, learned C and ported rb to the device of interest. My knowledge of embedded world was next to nothing when I started.
Logged

Offline jimmynova

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2012, 09:15:29 AM »
Stop!  ;D  Yer killin' me here!

Knowledge of the embedded world?  Wodz, my last contact with code was in BASIC, hunched over a DECwriter connected to an HP21xx via an AcoustiCoupler at 110 baud!  And that, according to my transcripts, apparently left something to be desired.

I'm happy I got the microwave to stop blinking "12:00."

So that, as Rick Harrison says, "is not going to happen."

Logged

Offline saratoga

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8974
Re: State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2012, 03:54:17 PM »
Quote from: jimmynova on July 20, 2012, 09:15:29 AM
So that, as Rick Harrison says, "is not going to happen."

Well then, aside from actually helping, there is not much you can do to help. 
Logged

Offline JohnP

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2012, 09:42:06 AM »
Quote
Find the bug that prevents booting OF, and fix it - it's somewhere in I2C
http://www.freemyipod.org/wiki/Todo_list

That would be a start I guess ?

I2C & 'Bug' -
 Doesn't sound like a good beginner-project :(

Edit : Is there some documentation somewhere on the HDD-layout on the iPod Classics ?
 



« Last Edit: July 21, 2012, 09:43:50 AM by JohnP »
Logged

Offline [Saint]

  • Rockbox Expert
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1662
  • Hayden Pearce
    • Google+
Re: State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB
« Reply #7 on: July 22, 2012, 03:55:36 AM »
Quote from: jimmynova on July 19, 2012, 10:16:56 AM
...and non-bricking...

This is already so, installation of Rockbox/emCORE will not brick your device.
Aside from deliberately making an effort to use the tools provided in a way that is unintended, the running joke around here is that the recommended way to brick an iPod, Rockbox'ed or not, is:

"With a hammer, and with great gusto"


Quote from: JohnP on July 21, 2012, 09:42:06 AM
Edit : Is there some documentation somewhere on the HDD-layout on the iPod Classics ?

I'm not sure what you expect to find there...

Could you please clarify?



[Saint]
« Last Edit: July 22, 2012, 04:09:14 AM by [Saint] »
Logged
Using PMs to annoy devs about bugs/patches is not a good way to have the issue looked at.

  • Print
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  State of / Accelerating Development on the Ipod Classic Slim 160GB
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.098 seconds with 14 queries.