Rockbox General > Rockbox General Discussion

Rockbox on Clip+ versus Clip Zip

<< < (2/4) > >>

bertrik:
The only things keeping the Clip Zip from stable are a couple of plugins (brickmania and sudoku) that are not adapted yet for the 96x96 screen resolution and lack of pictures/screenshots for the user manual.

The Clip Zip doesn't suffer from any additional bugs compared to the Clip+. Personally, I like the Clip Zip better because of the colour screen and radio RDS support with an si4703 tuner chip. Some Clip+'s have a different tuner chip (RDA5802) that seems more sensitive to interference.

jualit:
Based on the responses, I think I'm leaning toward the Clip Zip (since I feel that the increased screen size is worth it for some minor instability in games/plugins that I don't plan on using). I'll hold off for a little bit on purchasing it, though, in case my mind is changed.

sockbox:
screen size is inconsequential. One is square and the other rectangle. You sacrifice length or width if you go with either.

128x66 = 8488px
96x96 = 9216px
9216 - 8488 = 728px

The difference sounds like alot but when you work on building a WPS the clip+ screen is too squat, and the zip is too narrow.

gevaerts:

--- Quote from: sockbox on June 21, 2012, 08:59:13 PM ---screen size is inconsequential. One is square and the other rectangle. You sacrifice length or width if you go with either.

128x66 = 8488px
96x96 = 9216px
9216 - 8488 = 728px

The difference sounds like alot but when you work on building a WPS the clip+ screen is too squat, and the zip is too narrow.

--- End quote ---
That's resolution, not size :)

sockbox:
youre right. maybe it is larger.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page