Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Welcome to the Rockbox Technical Forums!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Support and General Use
| |-+  Audio Playback, Database and Playlists
| | |-+  WMA again
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6

Author Topic: WMA again  (Read 57687 times)

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: WMA again
« Reply #45 on: May 10, 2006, 05:57:34 PM »
Yeah, and when Preglow offers to help optimize, you should accept. ;-)
Logged

Offline Mr. Brownstone

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 199
Re: WMA again
« Reply #46 on: May 10, 2006, 07:21:36 PM »
Great work Marsdaddy! 8)
Logged
Of course, that’s just my opinion. I could be wrong.

Offline Marsdaddy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: WMA again
« Reply #47 on: May 11, 2006, 05:34:29 AM »
Quote from: preglow on May 10, 2006, 05:56:21 PM
When I had a look at the patch, I noticed you only seem to use 32 bit multiplies everywhere. Might the precision problems be related to this? We usually use 64 bit muls pretty much everywhere we can.

It's not that kind of inaccuracy, which makes me think it's a simple bug -- I encoded a simple sine wave to wma which I then decoded to wav and compared to the original sine wave - it's smooth enough but every so often the sample becomes inverted. I will however probably switch to using 64 bit before submitting.

I appreciate the comment about optimisation and once I shake out these basic decoding bugs I will submit -- functionality before performance!  ;)

Thank you all for your kind comments and interest - it's appreciated. Nice to be a small part of something good.
Logged

Offline RotAtoR

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 170
  • Somewhere but not here
Re: WMA again
« Reply #48 on: May 11, 2006, 09:46:36 AM »
Quote from: Marsdaddy on May 11, 2006, 05:34:29 AM
It's not that kind of inaccuracy, which makes me think it's a simple bug -- I encoded a simple sine wave to wma which I then decoded to wav and compared to the original sine wave - it's smooth enough but every so often the sample becomes inverted.

It sound to me like the sample value could be overflowing. I believe Musepack originally had a similar bug, which preglow fixed.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2006, 09:51:14 AM by RotAtoR »
Logged

Offline travishayes89

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 243
  • !!!AC/DC Rocks!!!
Re: WMA again
« Reply #49 on: May 17, 2006, 10:15:04 PM »
if this is integrated by the time 3.1 is released, it will make the first official build on iPod even better
Logged

Offline Mighty Sparrow

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: WMA again
« Reply #50 on: May 19, 2006, 10:53:15 AM »
I have 1000's of WMAs trapped inside my iRiver H320 / Rockbox, just deparate to be released ;)

Waiting in eager anticipation...

Thanks for your effort, Marsdaddy  :)
Logged

Offline timbo

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: WMA again
« Reply #51 on: May 23, 2006, 11:31:07 AM »
I only have a few .wma's, but I think this is such a good feature for rockbox and for rockbox/open-source advocacy that I'll be making / downloading some more files just so that I can help test this.  ;D

Keep up the good work!  :)
Logged

Offline zigford

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: WMA again
« Reply #52 on: May 28, 2006, 08:44:10 PM »
Just another vote for wma,

My brother just gave me a bunch of wma files.  He doesn't have the original source, so this codec for rockbox would be a life saver.

Cheers big ears.
Logged

Offline MrHiggy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: WMA again
« Reply #53 on: June 09, 2006, 04:20:03 AM »
I had a dream about this the other day ???

I've only got a few WMAs that I downloaded from the website of one particular artist. The other tracks by this guy I got from CDs. I can listen to half of his stuff in Rockbox or the other half in the original firmware. Too lazy to re-encode :P

Thanks for the work you're putting in, Marsdaddy. And everyone else for that matter.
Logged

Offline that_asian_guy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 500
Re: WMA again
« Reply #54 on: June 09, 2006, 09:50:23 AM »
I can't wait until this is finished. My friend just gave me a couple hundred wma's, and neither rockbox nor the apple firmware can play them. Since it looks like it's gonna be a long time since this is released, i guess my only choice is to convert them to ogg. Keep up the great work ;D.
Logged
Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
-Terry Pratchett

Win Free Stuff Just By Using A Search Engine!

Offline Davide-NYC

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 429
Re: WMA again
« Reply #55 on: June 10, 2006, 12:12:54 AM »
Yeah, real-time WMA decoding would make Rockbox even more totally ass-kicking than it already is. Seriously Inno and iRiver should just ressurect the H1xx series with a better screen and a teeny circuit breaker (for protection against incorrect power input) and just sell it with Rockbox pre-installed. WMA support would absolutely rule! Thank you, good luck and may the god of your choosing speed your progress.  ;)
Logged
Currently: iRiver H132-RTC-CFMod

Offline LinusN

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1914
Re: WMA again
« Reply #56 on: June 11, 2006, 03:51:19 AM »
Well, let's first see if Marsdaddy turns up here again. It's been over a month since his last post.
Logged
Archos Jukebox 6000, Recorder, FM Recorder/iAudio X5/iriver H1x0, H3x0/Toshiba Gigabeat F20/iPod G5, G5.5

Offline Antony

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: WMA again
« Reply #57 on: June 14, 2006, 03:48:04 PM »
Sounds like your doing some great work marsdaddy - but if you've hit a brick wall or won't have the time to continue things for a while, i think there are a number of people anxiously anticipating this codec (including me) and also a number of people willing to lend a hand if you want. That aside i fully understand wanting to achieve it yourself, i'm exactly the same! keep up the good work.
Logged

Offline techSage

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: WMA again
« Reply #58 on: June 15, 2006, 08:18:49 PM »
This is a most exciting project you've undertaken, Marsdaddy.  Please continue you work - this should be a huge deal when you get it working - remember when HP didn't add (enable, actually; since the PortalPlayer chip supports it natively) WMA support to the iPod despite the rumors?  Just the rumors made a pretty big splash.  I've been waiting for this ever since HP dropped that ball.

I would finally buy an iPod if/when this works.
Logged

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: WMA again
« Reply #59 on: June 15, 2006, 11:29:53 PM »
It wouldn't allow you to play DRM-protected WMAs anyway.
And there are better formats for you to convert your CDs to, so WMA shouldn't really be a show-stopper from buying an MP3 player supported by Rockbox.

Also, where did you get that the PortalPlayer chip natively supports WMA? Are you using "supports" in the sense that it's a multipurpose processor and can decode anything someone writes a codec for?
Logged

  • Print
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Support and General Use
| |-+  Audio Playback, Database and Playlists
| | |-+  WMA again
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.142 seconds with 14 queries.