Support and General Use > Audio Playback, Database and Playlists
WMA again
Bagder:
If you just produce a package/patch with what you have that shows the problem, I'm sure there are several people around that can help you.
Cooperation is what makes open source different you know!
Mr. Brownstone:
Good luck and excellent work!
But here's a suggestion: Why not show your code to the other ROCKbox devs here? They already have a great deal of experience working with the H300's and may be able to show you where you're going wrong, and will speed up your learning process and development time. :)
linuxstb:
--- Quote from: Marsdaddy on April 10, 2006, 07:56:37 AM ---Further update for those awaiting this!
I have completed the plugin WMA decoder and have been banging my head against the wall for the last few days because although the code compiles and runs fine in the uisimulator, it won't compile for my platform, the iRiver H340. For the technically minded, it causes an internal compiler error "insn does not satisfy its constraints".
I have been attempting to come up with test code that exhibits the problem but of course it does not show when I isolate the code. I will continue to rework/reorder the code until I get it to generate correctly.
Wish me luck ???
--- End quote ---
I've came up against these problems with porting the AAC codec - it's due to bugs in the m68k version of gcc.
One thing that worked was to ensure that the signedness of variables was consistent - i.e. removing comparisons between signed and unsigned variables seems to tickle gcc into submission.
Otherwise, just try randomly changing your code...
But as Daniel said, if you post a package of your source so far, then others would be happy to help.
Marsdaddy:
--- Quote from: linuxstb on April 10, 2006, 08:25:20 AM ---I've came up against these problems with porting the AAC codec - it's due to bugs in the m68k version of gcc.
One thing that worked was to ensure that the signedness of variables was consistent - i.e. removing comparisons between signed and unsigned variables seems to tickle gcc into submission.
--- End quote ---
Thanks for this - I've made some modifications and it's got me past the original problem onto some more constraints violations. Thanks again for the suggestion 8)
MU4L:
Just wondering if there was any more news on the progression front, Marsdaddy :) ?
Hope everything's going well,
MU4L
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version