Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Welcome to the Rockbox Technical Forums!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  Fuze V2 vs Clip-Zip Hardware diffs
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Fuze V2 vs Clip-Zip Hardware diffs  (Read 1105 times)

Offline ig.shum

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Fuze V2 vs Clip-Zip Hardware diffs
« on: November 22, 2011, 05:02:42 AM »
i'm deliberating between purchasing a Fuze V2 (4GB), or a Clip-Zip (4GB), which i'll use with a 32GB microSDHC
they both use the same processor  (AS3525v2), and support upto 32GB SDHC.
the Fuze has a bigger screen.
are there other hardware differences that influence behavior? like:
  • Cpu clock speed, making one device respond faster
  • Different DAC making one device sound "better" (by most) under same EQ settings
  • More internal Cpu memory, making one device support a bigger Database, more Mp3 files or RockBox utils

i'm aware of the specification-advertised differences like battery-time, screen-resolution and such..
i'm asking about the unadvertised under-the-hood info.
Logged

Offline saratoga

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8974
Re: Fuze V2 vs Clip-Zip Hardware diffs
« Reply #1 on: November 22, 2011, 09:28:25 AM »
Just the screen. By the way w have a detailed wiki page about the variousvsansa players and their hardware.
Logged

  • Print
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  Fuze V2 vs Clip-Zip Hardware diffs
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.077 seconds with 17 queries.