Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Rockbox Ports are now being developed for various digital audio players!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox Development
| |-+  Feature Ideas
| | |-+  user interface suggestions
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: user interface suggestions  (Read 5354 times)

Offline dumbo777

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
user interface suggestions
« on: March 23, 2011, 12:20:14 PM »
The good news is that Rockbox has added many features and one can do many things with this application.

The bad news from a user interface perspective is that users must do many things to play songs.  The current user interface has become so cluttered that nothing is intuitive, which raises a very high bar for the user manual to clearly explain things that the current manual does not meet.

Rather than making the user manual even longer to explain everything clearly, I recommend a radical simplification of the user interface so that it is far easier to just playback songs via track, album, genre, or other simple tag.  Place all other functions behind the appropriate menu that a user can avoid to just play songs.

A typical user interface test is to hand a device to a profient tech user who is unfamiliar with your device, and see if they can figure out how to do simple things without reading a manual.  I love the intent and performance of rockbox, but the current user interface fails this basic test.

If Rockbox is content with the current number of users and new users are not a priority, then there is no need to do this, but this would be vey helpful in attracting new users.

thanks for considering this.
Logged

Offline gevaerts

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1053
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2011, 12:41:57 PM »
Quote from: dumbo777 on March 23, 2011, 12:20:14 PM
The current user interface has become so cluttered that nothing is intuitive,

That's of course because nothing is intuitive.

Quote
Rather than making the user manual even longer to explain everything clearly, I recommend a radical simplification of the user interface so that it is far easier to just playback songs via track, album, genre, or other simple tag.  Place all other functions behind the appropriate menu that a user can avoid to just play songs.

This would mean making the database the primary interface. A majority of developers don't use the database at all. You'll have a very hard time convincing people that this is anything other than a regression.

Quote
A typical user interface test is to hand a device to a profient tech user who is unfamiliar with your device, and see if they can figure out how to do simple things without reading a manual.  I love the intent and performance of rockbox, but the current user interface fails this basic test.

Does it? I don't remember having to read the manual to play audio when I started using rockbox.

Quote
If Rockbox is content with the current number of users and new users are not a priority, then there is no need to do this, but this would be vey helpful in attracting new users.

Basically most developers don't care much about the number of users. We want rockbox to be something we enjoy using. If other people like it too, that's a bonus.

Quote
thanks for considering this.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! I know what I said above may sound a bit harsh, and I don't want to make you feel unwelcome, but I also don't want to mislead you about what I perceive the project to be about.
Logged

Offline AlexP

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3688
  • ex-BigBambi
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2011, 12:54:05 PM »
The current interface is somewhat cluttered, but purely because there are so many options.  If you feel that the manual is lacking, then please supply us with patches to make it better.  We spend a lot of time on it, and feel that it is pretty good compared to most projects - however it could always be better.  Rather than just saying it is bad, how about helping make it better?

The database will not become the default user interface.  A large majority of developers don't use it, and not forcing people to use a database type system is what many people like about Rockbox.  If have my music organised how I like it thanks :)

I also managed to play music without the manual.  What does sometimes confuse people is the freedom; we sometimes get questions such as where to put the music because people are so used to being forced into doing what manufacturer X thinks they should do.

Anyway, of course improving things would be nice, but hiding everything away and forcing the database on people isn't the answer.
Logged
H140, F60, S120, e260, c240, Clip, Fuze v2, Connect, MP170, Meizu M3, Nano 1G, Android

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2011, 01:47:17 PM »
Quote
Rather than making the user manual even longer to explain everything clearly, I recommend a radical simplification of the user interface so that it is far easier to just playback songs via track, album, genre, or other simple tag.  Place all other functions behind the appropriate menu that a user can avoid to just play songs.

I'm curious what things aren't behind menus that are making it have overwhelmingly too many options. If you start the player, you'll find the choice to browse the file browser or database, either of which leads to your songs. You'll also find options to get to the menus where the settings are. Isn't this having the remainder of options behind appropriate menus?

It's not like the player starts into a huge list of every possible setting.
Logged

Offline bluebrother

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3421
  • creature
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2011, 03:57:47 PM »
Quote from: Llorean on March 23, 2011, 01:47:17 PM
I'm curious what things aren't behind menus that are making it have overwhelmingly too many options. If you start the player, you'll find the choice to browse the file browser or database, either of which leads to your songs. You'll also find options to get to the menus where the settings are. Isn't this having the remainder of options behind appropriate menus?

It's not like the player starts into a huge list of every possible setting.

That's exactly what I though when I read this thread. Oh, and we had some "simplification" in the past: the player did start up in the file browser, so you can immediately navigate the the correct folder and play the file you want. I don't see any way to make this simpler. But since people want a main menu Rockbox now starts in the main menu, not the file browser anymore. You can set the file browser as startup screen though.
Logged
Rockbox Utility development binaries (updated infrequently) · How to ask questions the smart way · We do not estimate timeframes.

Offline JdGordon

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1817
  • Constantly breaking stuff
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2011, 06:53:31 PM »
The *only* thing I think is worth talking about is renaming the "database" menu item so techno-drongos undestand what it is
Logged


Using PMs to annoy devs about bugs/patches is not a good way to have the issue looked at.

Offline Machete234

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2011, 02:44:40 PM »
I think the menu isnt cluttered at all and if you dont want more options use the OF.
Wanting more options is the reason to install rockbox.

The options itself seem to be in the right place for me.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2011, 02:56:26 PM by Machete234 »
Logged

Offline Yotto

  • Artist
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 826
  • Every Silver Lining has a Cloud
    • My Blog
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2011, 03:44:11 PM »
Quote from: JdGordon on March 23, 2011, 06:53:31 PM
The *only* thing I think is worth talking about is renaming the "database" menu item so techno-drongos undestand what it is

Just don't name it "My Music." :)
Logged
Pulp Audio Weekly - Where we talk about News, Reviews, and pretty much anything else we feel like discussing.

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2011, 03:59:11 PM »
My preference for it, if it were to be renamed, is "Library" since that's in line with some other programs, and also doesn't limit it by using the terms 'music' or 'audio' so it shouldn't need to be renamed if video or other media gets included in the future.
Logged

Offline gbl08ma

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 249
    • My blog
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2011, 05:59:33 PM »
Quote from: Llorean on March 25, 2011, 03:59:11 PM
My preference for it, if it were to be renamed, is "Library" since that's in line with some other programs, and also doesn't limit it by using the terms 'music' or 'audio' so it shouldn't need to be renamed if video or other media gets included in the future.
I agree. If the GSoC project explained in the wiki that involves adding support for more video formats and creating a "framework" (no idea how to explain it better with my own words) for playing both audio and video (including mixed playlists, etc.) ever gets implemented, probably it makes sense to list videos in the actual Database, right? It could still be named as Database (and I have nothing against that name), but Library is much more commonly used and is "techno-drongos"-compatible :)
Logged
http://gbl08ma.com | http://i.tny.im

Offline gevaerts

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1053
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2011, 07:21:07 PM »
I have to say that I don't like "Library", because for me it seems to imply that that's the primary place to find my audio, which it isn't.
Logged

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2011, 08:09:26 PM »
It may not be for you, but for a lot of our users used to other systems it probably is.

I don't want to speculate about the popularity of our database, but I *suspect* that those people who prefer a file view can see something like "Files" and "Library" (or perhaps "All Files" and "Media Library") and recognize that they can browse the files on their player directly.
Logged

Offline bluebrother

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3421
  • creature
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2011, 07:26:23 AM »
Quote from: Llorean on March 25, 2011, 08:09:26 PM
It may not be for you, but for a lot of our users used to other systems it probably is.

_If_ we rename the Database to Library people will also expect to see videos in there, and other file types that are handled by viewer plugins. Until the Database can also index those files calling it "Library" seems wrong (and misleading) to me.
Logged
Rockbox Utility development binaries (updated infrequently) · How to ask questions the smart way · We do not estimate timeframes.

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #13 on: March 26, 2011, 07:32:59 AM »
I don't know how "Library" would create such an expectation where "Database" doesn't.
Logged

Offline JdGordon

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1817
  • Constantly breaking stuff
Re: user interface suggestions
« Reply #14 on: March 27, 2011, 04:20:01 AM »
Quote from: bluebrother on March 26, 2011, 07:26:23 AM
_If_ we rename the Database to Library people will also expect to see videos in there, and other file types that are handled by viewer plugins. Until the Database can also index those files calling it "Library" seems wrong (and misleading) to me.

I'm not sure how you drew that conclusion but if it were true we could call it "Audio Library" without that fear.
Logged


Using PMs to annoy devs about bugs/patches is not a good way to have the issue looked at.

  • Print
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox Development
| |-+  Feature Ideas
| | |-+  user interface suggestions
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.189 seconds with 22 queries.