Support and General Use > Theming and Appearance Customization

Slow list scroll speed - iRiver H10

<< < (2/3) > >>

Buschel:
Megalos, can you please check if this build works for you?

http://www.sendspace.com/file/r7dafd

It implements some changes regarding the scroll acceleration. If it works please also judge if the acceleration is too fast now compared to the old implementation. Thanks in advance!

Megalos:
Sorry for the late answer. I'm very busy now (and yesterday). I'll try your suggestions tomorrow evening. Thanks for your work Buschel!
Post Merge: March 23, 2011, 02:25:55 PMBuschel, I've have tested a few releases of Rockbox. In all versions (including your version), the list did not accelerate if the 'List Acceleration Start Delay' was set to 'Off'. Below the results:

[release][acceleration works]    [smooth scrolling]3.2YESYES3.3YESYES3.4YESYES3.5YESYES3.5.1YESYES3.6NONO3.7NONO3.7.1NONOyour build      YESNO
In release 3.6 and newer, the scrolling is not smoothly anymore, but choppy. Also, your build has choppy scrolling. Apparently, something has changed when version 3.6 was released, as all prior builds were fine. As far as I can judge (that's difficult because of the choppiness), the acceleration speed is fine in your build.

Buschel:
Thanks for the perfect test! I will submit the fix to get acceleration running again later today.

I am not sure what introduced the choppyness. Maybe this is an effect of any CPU-intense playback? Does it happen when not playing a file?

Megalos:
The choppy scrolling does also happen when nothing is played back.

[Saint]:

--- Quote from: Megalos on March 24, 2011, 01:28:03 PM ---The choppy scrolling does also happen when nothing is played back.

--- End quote ---

I *think* I'm going to put that down to "only just noticed it".

A while ago now Buschel did a rework of the iPod Nano/Color LCD, and I noticed the same thing.
"Tearing" I described it as....and I was very much concerned with the fact (when I noticed it personally) that it may have been caused by the vastly increased throughput of the LCD.

However, I rolled back as far as 3.5 at that time and it was still there for me, so I figure I just never paid it very much attention until I had reason to.

Perhaps this is the case here too?



[St.]

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page