Support and General Use > Plugins/Viewers

LrcPlayer Bug On Sansa E200 v1

<< < (2/3) > >>

saratoga:

--- Quote from: redblade8 on October 07, 2010, 06:53:39 PM ---Oh, one of the builds that are updated daily? 3.6 is still the newest official build, you make it sound like it is old when it isn't.

--- End quote ---

I consider it old.


--- Quote from: redblade8 on October 07, 2010, 06:53:39 PM ---I don't like the daily builds for one reason, the wps's are coded differently ( from using one character :   |  to using two  ( & )  which doesn't make any sense to me as to why you would code using two characters when you coul;d just code with one |    ) & my wps that I made for 3.6 will not work on daily builds. I guess I will just have to hope that rockbox 3.7 will come out soon =P

--- End quote ---

They won't work with 3.7 either. 

torne:
3.6 is old; it was released four months ago. We change the code 10-50 times per day; four months is a huge span of time.

The current builds are not daily, they are every time the code changes.

The new WPS syntax is.. the new WPS syntax. The current builds are not different for no reason; they are different because they are based on newer code. 3.7 will be a copy of the current code at the time 3.7 is released (more or less) so it will also use the new WPS syntax.

redblade8:
Oh, thankyou for clearing this up.
- I don't see the point in changing the current 3.6 way of coding wps... it is way more efficient than  ( I said two, but that is wrong. I missed the comma ) having 3 characters instead of one . It is less efficient and makes you spend more time coding.
- I would like you to code a wps using the new wps syntax in rockbox using the text editor on a non-touch-screen target to see how much more time it takes to code than using the older 3.6 way. ( the way I currently do things because I do not usually have access to a computer ...) You will see that it takes longer to code than just using one | character.

- This is kind of off-topic and everything is now cleared up, so I guess I should be ignored now =P
I guess I can make an idea for the future of rockbox to support both new and old wps coding syntax's so people can choose between the two if they wish. - It would make my life much easier...
Thanks Again Everyone!

saratoga:

--- Quote from: redblade8 on October 18, 2010, 01:06:30 PM ---Oh, thankyou for clearing this up.
- I don't see the point in changing the current 3.6 way of coding wps... it is way more efficient than  ( I said two, but that is wrong. I missed the comma ) having 3 characters instead of one . It is less efficient and makes you spend more time coding.

--- End quote ---

If you don't want new features, do not upgrade rockbox.  You're welcome to use old builds forever.


--- Quote from: redblade8 on October 18, 2010, 01:06:30 PM ---- This is kind of off-topic and everything is now cleared up, so I guess I should be ignored now =P
I guess I can make an idea for the future of rockbox to support both new and old wps coding syntax's so people can choose between the two if they wish. - It would make my life much easier...

--- End quote ---

No. 

redblade8:
'If you don't want new features, do not upgrade rockbox.  You're welcome to use old builds forever.'

Alright, well I guess I will have fun being screwed over since I do want new features ( especially dictionary/ lrcplayer...etc...)  :D

'No.'

KK, sorry about all this then. ( and for misunderstanding you. )

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page