Rockbox General > Rockbox General Discussion

rockbox on fuze v2 not even nearby stable until now

<< < (2/2)

SpawnHyuuga:
I'll be the next to say, that he may not be the only one having problems - for awhile I thought maybe I'd bricked my Fuze v2, but I was able to get it running again. I'm still running into some minor problems with playback having a memory crash, and some skins also have the same problem.

Rydian:
I've been using rockbox on my v2 Fuze for a while as well.  Sometimes when upgrading it I hit a version that's terribly unstable and need to revert to a version a few points older.  28031 is what's currently installed and it's working fine for me.

evilnick:
It's still listed in Unstable Ports on the Rockbox front page. Therefore it is still officially considered unstable.

rmzalbar:
I'm confused.

Are we talking about unstable, or unreliable?

"stable" in software development, especially open development like this, usually means that it stops changing, so it can be used as a known point for branching off new builds with untested features.

Unreliable means it has issues which may produce undesired operation.

It is perfectly possible for a build to be stable AND unreliable, or vice versa.

I want to put this on my Fuze V2, but I'm not sure which, if any, builds are considered reliable, yet..

saratoga:

--- Quote from: rmzalbar on September 28, 2010, 08:19:54 PM ---I'm confused.

Are we talking about unstable, or unreliable?

--- End quote ---

http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/TargetStatus#Current_status_of_supported_targ


--- Quote from: rmzalbar on September 28, 2010, 08:19:54 PM ---"stable" in software development, especially open development like this, usually means that it stops changing, so it can be used as a known point for branching off new builds with untested features.

--- End quote ---

We don't ever stop changing rockbox builds and never will as long as the project is alive. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page