Rockbox Development > Feature Ideas
config per directory?
Confuseling:
Unless, in fairness, you just allowed loading configs to end the buffer.
I doubt there are many people who have playlists with music and audiobooks / podcasts in, which is the main use case.
[although my head nearly asploded trying to rewrite some keybindings, so the 'feel free to write a patch' point is well taken... :)]
soap:
--- Quote from: Confuseling on September 08, 2010, 07:36:51 PM ---I doubt there are many people who have playlists with music and audiobooks / podcasts in, which is the main use case.
--- End quote ---
*cough*
I routinely do, as I tend to plan my "DAP day" in the morning and create one 10-12 hour long playlist and then (try to) never touch my iPod again until I get home.
Confuseling:
Fair dues...
1) I suspect you're not 'many people' (in the nicest possible way :))
2) I suspect it wouldn't detract from your listening pleasure if there were a little bump between the two...
soap:
I'm finding your overall point confusing, Confuseling. As well as specifically what you're attempting to suggest with line-item 2 in the post immediately above.
Do you mind rephrasing the thrust of your "argument" and attempting to lay it out again?
Confuseling:
I simply mean that a small 'bump' in between different config files, where things like crossfading and gapless playback fail, would probably for most users (who would use the feature anyway) be a worthwhile price. And I'm guessing (with no relevant knowledge at all, admittedly) that that's what stopping and restarting the buffer would entail.
And if the whole thing's transparent and optional, it's no price at all for everyone else.
Not trying to be argumentative - or confusing - I just think that on balance, it's a good suggestion. Caveats about featuritis, bloat, maintainability, writing the darn thing in the first place all included.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version