Missing Theme

[Avalon]

Hi,

I have uploaded a couple of themes which have been listed for weeks since the recent syntax changes and 3.6 release. 

Recently, the theme FuzeRock+ for the Fuze is not listed.

Could you indicate why?

Thks

[Progweed]

I'd like to know that as well. I recently uploaded three themes ("CabbieV2++", "Keep it simple, stupid" default & dark) and they are all gone.

It's a shame, as some people seemed to like them.

If I made mistake or if something is wrong with my themes I'm of course more than willing to fix them ASAP.

[Avalon]

I had a closer look at the FuzeRock+ and found that some of the code that was previously accepted by the Theme checking software is now rejected.

I do not know the reason for this, since the theme worked for 3.6 with the new syntax and many people were using it.  It also worked fine in the simulator.

I spent a little time tracking down the code that was rejected and found that a reference to (root) appeared to be the problem.  I removed this and resubmitted.  It was accepted.

I suspect that since the syntax change, the theme checker has been upgraded more then once.  When you submit a theme, it does indicate the offending lines which is a great help in tracking down the problem.

I am not a developer, so my comments are really just observations.

Hope this helps.

[Progweed]

That helped a lot, thank you very much. You were right about the recent changes in the theme checker.

[pixelma]

I spent a little time tracking down the code that was rejected and found that a reference to (root) appeared to be the problem.  I removed this and resubmitted.  It was accepted.

If the theme should literally display

(root)

on the display, you probably now have to code it differently, "escaping" the ()s.

With the new parser () got a "meaning" in the WPS tags, if you want to display these characters, you need to write %( or %) so that the parser knows "just display them". This is similar to %% and %| to display percent sign or pipe which has been there since ages.

The example becomes

Code: [Select]

%(root%)

[Progweed]

Great, I was about to ask why this little snippet of code doesn't work anymore:

Code: [Select]

%?iy<(%iy)>

But you already answered that.