Recording Enhancements Pack

[LurkAzusa]

I'm selfishly sorry you don't have the time to work on Rockbox, but happy your real life is going so well.  I just want to say thank you so much for your contribution to getting recording to the incredible state it is in.  I've captured so many wonderful concerts over the last few years.

[TaperChuck]

Yeah, thank you very much Mmmm! Glad to hear you are doing well.

[Davide-NYC]

Cheers to Mmmm!

[petur]

yeah, /me knows what the arrival of a newborn does to your spare-time

[isanggon]

I almost successfully re-synced REP patch. The histogram printed wrong position but, it correctly works. However, my lack of understanding "recording.c" file, I cound not completed this patch. :'( I attach patch files here. Is any one can complete this, please help. I think there remains small, but big step.
When apply these patch, rec_button patch first. rec_button was done by kugel, but you should fix for hxxx series. you can easily fix keymap file, compare with attached keymap file.

[Llorean]

Why didn't you update the tasks on the tracker? Patches do not belong attached to the forums.

[isanggon]

I didn't saparetely worked REP patch. So I uploaded here. I didn't know patches should not belongs to here. I'll upload to tracker. Thanks for notifying me

-----------

Now I solved histogram positon problem. This problem was related with statusbar issue.
Remaining works is two.

1. remove last blank line upper of histogram
2. filename printing issue : when goes in recording, filename is missing.

I uploaded patch here.
http://www.rockbox.org/tracker/task/5021

[petur]

Great work

However, I'm reworking the recording screen massively so I am breaking all your work. Sorry.

My code is on the tracker as well, but do not use it as a basis for your modifications as I am still working on it.

[isanggon]

So sad.. but fine.

[Peter200lx]

Is there any chance now that there has been an official 3.0 release that this could be updated to work with that? I'd love to have my device on a stable build!

[TaperChuck]

That would be great!

[Chronon]

Well, 3.0 is kind of a snapshot build.  Any new functionality must be added to the current SVN trunk.  I'm not saying that no one will work on this, I just wanted to point out that you can't really add features to 3.0.

[bascule]

No, but if someone forked the REP code and worked on producing a 3.0-based custom REP build, that would effectively be the same thing and then the forked REP wouldn't have to be kept in sync with the trunk.

[Chronon]

Good point.  I guess it depends on whether the aim is to produce an unsupported build that has these features, or to try to get features introduced into the trunk.

[petur]

the aim should be to get parts of the REP in the normal builds, I hate forking

I just don't seem to find the time to do it....