Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Rockbox Ports are now being developed for various digital audio players!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  Which iPod is most stable in playing ape+cue?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Which iPod is most stable in playing ape+cue?  (Read 4050 times)

Offline Schoenberg

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Which iPod is most stable in playing ape+cue?
« on: June 16, 2010, 09:56:06 AM »
I am looking for an ape/flac/cue player.
My previous experience with Sansa Fuze last summer was very bad. The rockboxed sansa fuze can hardly play a big ape with cue smoothly.  It turned dead constantly.

I am looking for a player which can play best at big ape/cue files.  I prefer iPod especially. 
I currently own a sansa clip+.
Logged

Offline evilnick

  • Rockbox Expert
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 431
Re: Which iPod is most stable in playing ape+cue?
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2010, 10:09:06 AM »
Ape as a codec is very expensive in terms of CPU power, so your experience with the Fuze would have been better with flac.

It's possibly not the clearest wiki page to prove this point, but have a look at how quickly ape is decoded on here http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/CodecPerformanceComparison#Current_Results and bear in mind that 100% means it decodes it *barely* fast enough to play in realtime.

Results on one player (Sansa e200 v1 series) show that ape gets around 60 - 95+% whereas flac is around 600%, i.e. an order of magnitude "cheaper" to decode. While I'm not sure about the architecture on the iPods, this is at least an indication that flac is (currently) better suited to Rockbox than ape is, and as both are lossless codecs I would convert ape to flac.

And for some anecdotal evidence, I've used flac files on an iPod video and Rockbox has coped with them perfectly.
Logged

Offline Schoenberg

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Which iPod is most stable in playing ape+cue?
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2010, 10:15:15 AM »
Hi, thanks for your reply.  I understand that FLAC is a better/easier format but I just have too much APE files.  I have over 1000GB music files and 80% of them are in APE format.  Some MP3 players might perform better in APE than others do.
Logged

Offline AlexP

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3688
  • ex-BigBambi
Re: Which iPod is most stable in playing ape+cue?
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2010, 10:52:38 AM »
As both ape and flac are lossless you can transcode between them without losing quality.  Ape will not play well on ipods either, at anything other than the first (and maybe second) compression level.  Only the gigabeat S will play them all.

http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/SoundCodecMonkeysAudio

I would transcode to flac.  Ape is just too cpu intensive.
Logged
H140, F60, S120, e260, c240, Clip, Fuze v2, Connect, MP170, Meizu M3, Nano 1G, Android

Offline saratoga

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8974
Re: Which iPod is most stable in playing ape+cue?
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2010, 12:56:10 PM »
Quote from: Schoenberg on June 16, 2010, 10:15:15 AM
I have over 1000GB music files and 80% of them are in APE format.  Some MP3 players might perform better in APE than others do.

What compression level are they at?
Logged

  • Print
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  Which iPod is most stable in playing ape+cue?
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.083 seconds with 15 queries.