We have recently seen the inclusion of a few new players. In the interest of keeping the wiki up to date, I would like to invite owners of these new targets to add their players to the table on the PluginIndex page in the wiki.
It seems that v1 and v2 players should be differentiated as different targets (i.e. different hardware means different port and plugins might not work uniformly between them).
Edit: I have added the MR-100 to the table. I also added a heading for Fuze in the table. Someone had placed a category string on the PluginMpegplayer so I used that. If you want to help fill in the plugins for Fuze, just visit a plugin page and edit the bracketed list after "CategoryPlugin" so that it includes an entry like "Sansa Fuze%Y%".
Edit 2: We don't distinguish between v1 and v2 iPod Minis. Different hardware revisions of the same player should tend to present the same interface to users, so key maps should be the same as well as appearance of various plugins on-screen. Maybe differentiation should be seen as a temporary distinction that can be eliminated once different hardware revisions reach parity. Any thoughts on the best way to organize this with the growing number of devices with multiple hardware revisions?
Edit 3: For now I'll just list by model name. If, for example, e200 v2 doesn't support the same list of plugins as the v1 then we can either denote the exceptions with footnotes, or else a new column can be made.
Topic: Add new targets to PluginIndex (Read 849 times)
