Rockbox General > Rockbox General Discussion

In praise of Rockbox's support (was Everyone PLEASE READ! (IPod Nano 2G) )

<< < (2/3) > >>

sadzior:
totally agree with the post above

shayguitarra:
Sometimes the mods and developers must think that users are an ungrateful shower. So it's good that someone has created a short thread for those of us who use rockbox, constantly and on a daily basis without much trouble.

Personally I quite like the fact that people on this forum are direct, to the point and treat me like an adult, in contrast to the faux sincerity of so-called "customer service."

Best thing about rockbox? Playing my ogg and flac files on an 80gb ipod video. And occasionally realising the usefulness of some piece of functionality I never saw the point of.

So your (unpaid) labours are appreciated and understood by those of us who have bothered to RTFM!  ;)

gdfj12:
I to am impressed by Rockbox & agree with the OP.

gulak:

--- Quote from: farleytron on March 10, 2010, 02:18:51 PM ---I just finished reading the thread "The worst thing about Rockbox."

I'm absolutely disgusted by the ingratitude of the losers ...

--- End quote ---
You can simply say you're not agree with them, but calling them "losers" is insulting.

Those two guys didn't say anything bad about Rockbox itself. Their complain is more about how some guys answering questions and the overemphasizing of the manual.


--- Quote from: AlexP on March 11, 2010, 03:06:10 AM ---Heh, cheers chaps :)

--- End quote ---
Isn't there a forum rule to use a descriptive title? Is "Everyone PLEASE READ! (iPod Nano 2G)" descriptive? I can't read anything about iPod Nano 2G. Why do you applaud to someone who violates a forum rule? It would be fair to treat everyone the same.

AlexP:

--- Quote from: gulak on March 13, 2010, 08:25:04 AM ---Isn't there a forum rule to use a descriptive title? Is "Everyone PLEASE READ! (iPod Nano 2G)" descriptive? I can't read anything about iPod Nano 2G. Why do you applaud to someone who violates a forum rule? It would be fair to treat everyone the same.

--- End quote ---

Yes, there is and this thread doesn't have one, which should be changed.  However, to say I am applauding the lack of a descriptive title is a bit much - I said thank you for the content of the original post as I think is very clear.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page