Rockbox Ports are now being developed for various digital audio players!
Am I reading this wrong, or does the device need at least 3300mV to operate, or could the scales just be wrong?
I have a e200. I think I'll do a battery bench.txt & see if I get similar results, also to keep a small chart to show what the percentages really mean.
But not accurate percentages. For example in Sadzior's case when it showed 40% he really had less than 10% usage left. (He got more than 10 hours out of a full charge, but from "40%" to 0 went by in just one hour.)
With current builds I play mp3 for ~ 14h30, things have improved a bit since last release but I think it depends on the codec you use
Hello everyone.Just to report - I'm having the same problem but to a certain extreme. Today my fully charged fuze destroyed the battery in two (and I am in no way kidding) hours. I will try to run the benchmark as soon as I'm able to.Regards
Battery bench run for Sandisk Sansa Fuze version 3.5.107:47:47, 28067, 038%, 03:56, 3642, -, -, -07:48:48, 28128, 037%, 03:50, 3637, -, -, -07:49:48, 28188, 036%, 03:44, 3631, -, -, -07:50:48, 28248, 036%, 03:44, 3626, -, -, -07:51:48, 28308, 035%, 03:37, 3620, -, -, -07:52:48, 28368, 035%, 03:37, 3616, -, -, -07:53:48, 28428, 034%, 03:31, 3611, -, -, -07:54:48, 28488, 033%, 03:25, 3603, -, -, -07:55:48, 28548, 033%, 03:25, 3597, -, -, -07:56:48, 28608, 032%, 03:19, 3590, -, -, -07:57:48, 28668, 031%, 03:13, 3585, -, -, -07:58:34, 28714, 030%, 03:09, 3578, -, -, -07:59:34, 28774, 030%, 03:06, 3573, -, -, -08:00:35, 28835, 029%, 03:00, 3564, -, -, -08:01:35, 28895, 028%, 02:54, 3555, -, -, -08:02:35, 28955, 027%, 02:48, 3548, -, -, -08:03:35, 29015, 026%, 02:41, 3540, -, -, -08:04:35, 29075, 025%, 02:35, 3533, -, -, -08:05:35, 29135, 025%, 02:35, 3526, -, -, -08:06:35, 29195, 024%, 02:29, 3519, -, -, -08:07:35, 29255, 023%, 02:23, 3510, -, -, -08:08:35, 29315, 022%, 02:16, 3501, -, -, -08:09:35, 29375, 021%, 02:10, 3492, -, -, -08:10:35, 29435, 020%, 02:04, 3483, -, -, -08:11:35, 29495, 019%, 01:58, 3473, -, -, -08:12:35, 29555, 018%, 01:52, 3465, -, -, -08:13:35, 29615, 016%, 01:39, 3452, -, -, -08:14:26, 29666, 015%, 01:36, 3443, -, -, -08:15:26, 29726, 014%, 01:27, 3432, -, -, -08:16:26, 29786, 013%, 01:20, 3418, -, -, -08:17:26, 29846, 011%, 01:08, 3403, -, -, -08:18:26, 29906, 009%, 00:56, 3387, -, -, -08:19:26, 29966, 007%, 00:43, 3371, -, -, -08:20:26, 30026, 006%, 00:37, 3356, -, -, -08:20:44, 30044, 005%, 00:34, 3352, -, -, -08:21:44, 30104, 003%, 00:18, 3334, -, -, -08:22:44, 30164, 001%, 00:06, 3315, -, -, -08:23:44, 30224, 000%, 00:00, 3298, -, -, -
Code: [Select]Battery bench run for Sandisk Sansa Fuze version 3.5.1
Battery bench run for Sandisk Sansa Fuze version 3.5.1
Sorry can't fit the whole thing in one post and can't doublepost. If you'd tell me how to post the whole thing I would gladly do that. I don't really understand the chart but if it suggests I had a 8 hour long session it's full of bullcrap because the battery lasted 4 hours at max this time.
I don't really understand the chart
Page created in 0.118 seconds with 14 queries.