Rockbox Development > Feature Ideas

Equalizer while recording h120

<< < (2/2)

AlexP:
Could be, in which case I guess it is an incorrect translation for treble, in which case I still win!

Wacholek:
Sorry for my bad English. Of corse i was talking about treble. I didn't catch than, spell check also.

So is it possible to implement this future in the firmware?

By the way. Why Rockbox have to re-sample audio from digital source (i.e. 48KHz) to 44KHz. We have vary bad sound then. Philips UDA1380 can sample with 55KKHz and play even 100kHz so where is a catch?

AlexP:

--- Quote from: Wacholek on February 04, 2010, 05:05:26 PM ---By the way. Why Rockbox have to re-sample audio from digital source (i.e. 48KHz) to 44KHz. We have vary bad sound then. Philips UDA1380 can sample with 55KKHz and play even 100kHz so where is a catch?

--- End quote ---

See your other thread.  Let's keep one subject in one thread.  For the record, I don't think it can do the frequencies you mention (but keep it in the other thread).

saratoga:

--- Quote from: Wacholek on February 04, 2010, 05:05:26 PM ---So is it possible to implement this future in the firmware?

--- End quote ---

Probably, but its not a useful feature, so I don't think it will be.  If you want EQ, do it on a PC.


--- Quote from: Wacholek on February 04, 2010, 05:05:26 PM ---By the way. Why Rockbox have to re-sample audio from digital source (i.e. 48KHz) to 44KHz. We have vary bad sound then. Philips UDA1380 can sample with 55KKHz and play even 100kHz so where is a catch?

--- End quote ---

Are you talking about digital or analog recording?  The hardware isn't capable of analog recording at 48kHz recording due to lack of a proper 48kHz clock source on the h100.  I don't know about 48khz digital.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page