Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Thank You for your continued support and contributions!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Installation / Removal
| |-+  Manual Installation
| | |-+  Sandisk - Installation/Removal
| | | |-+  Status of RockBox C250v2
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Status of RockBox C250v2  (Read 5192 times)

Offline ScottMartin

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Status of RockBox C250v2
« on: January 20, 2010, 09:21:16 PM »
Is there a status page of the current status of C200V2 (ie, playback does not yet exist)

I have seen mention that version:
rockbox-sansac200v2-20100114.zip does allow playback.

It was also mentioned that the current version does not provide playback at this time.

Does anyone have the older version mentioned above that I could download?

Regards,
Scott.
Logged

Offline saratoga

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8974
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2010, 09:29:31 PM »
http://www.rockbox.org/wiki/SansaAMS

You can make any revision you like by checking out and compiling, but as I told you before, playback doesn't work, and using old builds won't fix that. 
Logged

Offline ScottMartin

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2010, 09:31:41 PM »
Thanks.

I was not trying to  dismiss your comments, but another user mentioned that they indeed have playback on an older version and that when they upgraded to the latest version, they lost playback.

I was just curious if this was the case.

Also, I see the comments for the page you provided does mention that playback is available?

Regards,
Scott.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2010, 09:33:20 PM by ScottMartin »
Logged

Offline yapper

  • Rockbox Expert
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 794
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2010, 09:40:34 PM »
Playback may work to some extent, but as summarized on the front page (http://www.rockbox.org/) the c200v2 isn't even currently considered "unstable", let alone "stable".
Logged
G2 iPod 20GB / Sansa c240 v1 + 2GB microSD / Sansa c250 v1 / Sansa e250 v1 + 8GB microSDHC / Sansa Fuze v2 + 32GB microSDHC

Offline ScottMartin

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2010, 09:46:51 PM »
OK.
Logged

Offline saratoga

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8974
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2010, 09:53:10 PM »
Quote from: ScottMartin on January 20, 2010, 09:31:41 PM
Thanks.

I was not trying to  dismiss your comments, but another user mentioned that they indeed have playback on an older version and that when they upgraded to the latest version, they lost playback.

They are wrong.

Quote from: ScottMartin on January 20, 2010, 09:31:41 PM
Also, I see the comments for the page you provided does mention that playback is available?

"Clip/c200v2/m200v4: Playback & recording crashes (infrequent on Clip, frequent on others), recording is completely disabled."

If thats unclear, feel free to improve it.  The wiki is editable by the public.
Logged

Offline fratermus

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • The Mousepad
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2010, 10:53:09 PM »
Quote from: saratoga on January 20, 2010, 09:53:10 PM
They are wrong.

If you are saying my report is counterfactual:   I am willing to send video of it --

A:   not playing any files on the most recent daily build, and
B:   playing at least one complete file on a prior build

That was my claim;  it is proveable and reproduceable on my c200v2.


Logged
'boxed players:
e260v1 w/2GB card, e250v1 w/8GB card
iPod Mini 4GB 2nd Gen

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2010, 10:57:06 PM »
You yourself said that playback doesn't continue onto the second file, which fits with his statement that playback still crashes.

The fact that one build is apparently capable of completing some files (depending on the file, most likely) does not prove that playback works - once playback consistently doesn't fail at any point you can start claiming such.
Logged

Offline saratoga

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8974
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2010, 11:00:39 PM »
The crash on the c200v2 is probably just due to how handles line up with the edge of the ring buffer in each build.  I think each build should be stable for some subset of files that align in some way, and unstable for others.  I doubt specific builds are any better or worse then one another. 
Logged

Offline ScottMartin

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #9 on: January 20, 2010, 11:38:38 PM »
Quote
If you are saying my report is counterfactual:

In the 25+ years I have been a software developer and IT manager, you will surprised how many times I run into this from people who can write some code.

Thanks for the file.

Regards,
Scott.
Logged

Offline fratermus

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • The Mousepad
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2010, 12:56:17 AM »
B.N.  In the spirit of accurate information I will take another swipe at it.  I hope that this clarification has some value for users or developers. 

Quote from: Llorean on January 20, 2010, 10:57:06 PM
The fact that one build is apparently capable of completing some files (depending on the file, most likely) does not prove that playback works - once playback consistently doesn't fail at any point you can start claiming such.

That is something of a straw man.  I tried several builds last week.  All of them played any 1 file I chose to play.


It might be productive to revisit what it is that I am, and have been, claiming.  Here it is:

Quote
I could play an mp3 file reliably under a prior build but not at all under today's build.  There is something in today's build that breaks, or continues to break, what little playback functionality existed in a prior build.

A more specific version might look like this: 
Quote
I can play any given mp3 file exactly once, reliably, under r24225-100113 but not at all under r24302-100120.   There is something in r24302 that breaks, or continues to break, what little playback functionality existed in r24225.

It does appear that any MP3 will play (all those I've tried) as long as it's tried first after reboot (ie, no other file has been played). 

The failure to play the subsequent file has these symptoms:
* the new file's info is loaded to the UI (name, length, etc).  I have not checked the accuracy of the length but I think it was right.
* the audio never starts
* the timer never advances beyond 0:00. 
* the UI remains responsive.  It is possible to navigate all over and interact with Rockbox but the 2nd file will not play.

On the current build the failure to play the 1st file looks /exactly/ like the failure to play the 2nd file on the earlier build.  Same symptoms.

If I have misrepresented the capabilities of either build in this or the original thread please point out my error and I will fix it so readers will not be mislead by my error.

Here is a video of mp3 playback, and the later build's failure to play even one.  I apologize for the craptastic video.  That's the "compact" mode in the Dear Wife's digicam.  I shot versions normal mode, too;  you could clearly read the screen but the files were 50-100MB.  D'oh!

{edited to add link to original thread}
Logged
'boxed players:
e260v1 w/2GB card, e250v1 w/8GB card
iPod Mini 4GB 2nd Gen

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2010, 01:36:44 AM »
A single file playing, then playback breaking is not playback "working."

That's the problem - "playback works" means "you can listen to music like a normal MP3 player." Telling someone playback worked on older builds when you really mean "it's marginally less broken" is not a useful statement.

It's not a "straw man." Older builds than last weeks have, on and off, been in varying states of playback. If they all worked for you, that's great. All you've "proved" is a basic "it works for me" that's useless.

Nobody actually working on anything claimed playback was supposed to work, so saying "it's broken" doesn't tell anyone anything new, even if it did work briefly it wasn't supposed to work, and wasn't actually in working condition. The minimal playback you experienced was a fluke of the broken playback code and whatever fix necessary now was still necessary a week ago, you were just somewhat lucky.

That's more or less Saratoga's point - claiming it worked a week ago is misleading and incorrect. You didn't have playback in the sense that everything worked, and he simply stated that if someone claimed playback worked they were wrong - this is true, what you experienced isn't even remotely what we'd call working playback.
Logged

Offline saratoga

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8974
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2010, 01:40:08 AM »
Quote from: fratermus on January 21, 2010, 12:56:17 AM

If I have misrepresented the capabilities of either build in this or the original thread please point out my error and I will fix it so readers will not be mislead by my error.


Well you certainly mislead Scott, who read your post to say that playback was stable, even if thats not what you meant him to think. 

Quote from: fratermus on January 21, 2010, 12:56:17 AM
The failure to play the subsequent file has these symptoms:
* the new file's info is loaded to the UI (name, length, etc).  I have not checked the accuracy of the length but I think it was right.
* the audio never starts
* the timer never advances beyond 0:00. 
* the UI remains responsive.  It is possible to navigate all over and interact with Rockbox but the 2nd file will not play.

I've spent a very large amount of time trouble shooting this bug.  You don't need to explain it to me ;)
Logged

Offline ScottMartin

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Status of RockBox C250v2
« Reply #13 on: January 21, 2010, 09:59:24 AM »
Quote
I've spent a very large amount of time trouble shooting this bug.  You don't need to explain it to me

You may want to have another look. I received the older version in question and I am working without fail. I am on my 4th song and still going.

Using the latest version(s), I was unable to get any playback at all.

disclaimer: I have read all the comments about it is not working, not stable.. and I understand. I also know that you now have 2 users that can get playback using an older version. My playback, unlike Fratermus, is uninterrupted and continuous.

Use this information, or not.

Added:

In my playback, I have noticed that _sometimes_ it will start a new song, then immediately jump to another song and start playing, but I am still working since my last post. The jump is so quick that I cannot tell if it is restarting the current song, then jumping to new song, or if the jump involves new songs altogether.

Just a little info to help with the debug process.

Regards,
Scott.
« Last Edit: January 21, 2010, 11:11:52 AM by ScottMartin »
Logged

  • Print
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Installation / Removal
| |-+  Manual Installation
| | |-+  Sandisk - Installation/Removal
| | | |-+  Status of RockBox C250v2
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.094 seconds with 14 queries.