Support and General Use > Recording

New recording idea, a bit crazy

<< < (4/9) > >>

b0br:
Very well!
I need such feature so much for composing music for percussions and saxophones (it's one of major reasons why i get h340 on monday). I'm glad you suggested this - i had the same idea in head for 3 weeks :))

Is there any difference in technical things discussed between h100 and h300 series? Would it work on both in the same way (i mean when somebody writes the code fo h100, would it - after some changes - work on h300?

pabouk:
H300 series is very similar to H100. I think it would work there with minimal modifications.

Paul Slocum:
Really cool idea.  Based on my experience with audio recording on older computers, I'd guess that several simulataneous tracks/samples could be played back at once.

Considering the limited display of the iRiver (and most DAPs) a tracker-style interface would probably make more sense.  Although originally designed for synth chips, they can work for audio.  A non-graphic interface takes a little getting used to, but it's intuitive once you get the hang of it.  And it's much easier to code.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracker

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module_file

-paul

fizze:
H100 and H300 are exactly the same as far as cpu horsepower and such is concerned.
the only difference is that  the H300s have 32MB of RAM, while the H100s have 16MB, iirc.

Yes, this would make a VERY worthwile addition, especially when I think of potential optical digital inputs on the H100s.... :)

pabouk:
H100s have 16 or 32 MB RAM: H110 and H115 - 16MB;  H120 and H140 - 32 MB

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page