Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Thank You for your continued support and contributions!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Support and General Use
| |-+  Recording
| | |-+  what player for recording?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: what player for recording?  (Read 5972 times)

Offline dr.pheel

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
what player for recording?
« on: November 27, 2008, 04:52:40 PM »
hello,

I have been using rockbox on my h120 very successfully for years now. my brother recently asked me what player he should buy - he mostly needs it to record (classical music, mostly violins...) any recommendations what new player is best for this purpose at the moment?
obviously i want him to be able to use rockbox on it, it needs to have an external mic input - it should be able to record  .wav files.

I suppose it doesn't need to be a 20gb hard disc recorder like my iriver as he does not basically plan to use it as a music player, and he says a couple of hours recording time would be enough...


thaks for your ideas,

greetz ph
Logged

Offline petur

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 769
  • wtb: time
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2008, 05:36:13 PM »
unfortunately there are no new supported players that have line-in.
So the choice remains iriver h1x0/h3x0 or iaudio x5. They pop up on ebay from time to time

I'm hoping maybe a port for the iriver E100 gets started, it has line-in as well....
Logged

Offline dr.pheel

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2008, 05:57:46 PM »
oh, that's sad to hear :(

i just got into looking at those cowon players - the iaudio 7 especially
so rockbox does not run on those? do you recon it might soon?
have you had any experience with those? are they fairly ok with their own firmware (until rockbox might work on it...)?
do you know if the controll for mic volume works ok on those?

thanks for your help meanwhile, ph
Logged

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2008, 07:11:25 PM »
There's no way to even try to predict when Rockbox will run on any future player. Sometimes people work on them and stop suddenly. Sometimes we don't know about people working on them until someone shows up with an awful lot of work already done.

As well, these boards aren't really here for discussing the functionality and features of the original firmware.
Logged

Offline petur

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 769
  • wtb: time
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2008, 04:30:24 AM »
Quote from: dr.pheel on November 27, 2008, 05:57:46 PM
i just got into looking at those cowon players - the iaudio 7 especially
so rockbox does not run on those? do you recon it might soon?
have you had any experience with those? are they fairly ok with their own firmware (until rockbox might work on it...)?
do you know if the controll for mic volume works ok on those?

I have no idea at all. Never been near an iaudio 7.
Logged

Offline jbills

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2008, 05:32:33 AM »
you might consider one of the old archos jukebox recorders.  they will record to .wav line in via the wav recording plugin.  I think eventually they will probably integrate it into the regular recording setup so it's as easy as a menu option.

the v1 jbr was fairly easily modded with a larger hard drive and better batteries, and the v2 was a step up but harder to mod the hard drive. (messy - soldering req'd)

both are fairly regularly up on ebay, and cheap!
Logged

Offline Davide-NYC

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 429
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2008, 10:36:45 AM »
+1 for the iRiver H1x0 series.
Logged
Currently: iRiver H132-RTC-CFMod

Offline davehouse

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2008, 03:28:35 PM »
Can anyone tell me if there are any practical reasons to go for an iRiver H1** over and H3** ? I fried my beloved H120 and am looking into replacements. H3**'s are cheaper on eBay. I don't want to get one, though, if the recording capabilities are limited in any way compared to the H1** which served me wonderfully for years.

Many thanks
Logged

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2008, 03:55:17 PM »
The H300 series don't have the optical input/output. I believe that's the only significant difference.
Logged

Offline Davide-NYC

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 429
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2008, 02:21:09 AM »
Here's a list of the positives for either unit as I see them.

FactorH1x0H3x0Why is this Good?
Case MaterialPlastic CaseFewer ground loop or stray voltage issues.
SizeSlightly ThinnerSmaller is (almost) always better
ProtrusionsFlush ButtonsLess likely to be accidentally engaged
SPDIFOptical I/OFantastic if you have the ability to use it.
Display ColorColorColors are pretty

I've probably missed something. Chime in!  :)
« Last Edit: December 18, 2008, 09:09:17 AM by Llorean »
Logged
Currently: iRiver H132-RTC-CFMod

Offline Hillshum

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 108
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #10 on: December 18, 2008, 02:24:50 AM »
Some (5g at least) iPods have a line in in the dock connector. You will need to buy/make an adapter.
Logged

Offline petur

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 769
  • wtb: time
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #11 on: December 18, 2008, 03:27:57 AM »
Quote from: Davide-NYC on December 18, 2008, 02:21:09 AM
FactorH1x0H3x0Why is this Good?
Case MaterialPlastic CaseFewer ground loop or stray voltage issues.
SizeSlightly ThinnerSmaller is (almost) always better
ProtrusionsFlush ButtonsLess likely to be accidentally engaged
SPDIFOptical I/OFantastic if you have the ability to use it.
Display ColorColorColors are pretty

I don't agree with the flush buttons. The front buttons of the h300 are hard to press by accident, the h100 joystick on the other hand is easily bumped into.

« Last Edit: December 18, 2008, 09:09:09 AM by Llorean »
Logged

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #12 on: December 18, 2008, 09:08:50 AM »
I'm sorry, but 'stealth' recording is just another form of Copyright Infringement. If you need to hide your recorder, you aren't supposed to be doing it.

Please, do not discuss copyright infringement methods here. Feel free to edit the basic info back into your posts without mention or suggestion of use for copyright infringement if you'd like.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2008, 09:14:57 AM by Llorean »
Logged

Offline petur

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 769
  • wtb: time
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #13 on: December 19, 2008, 03:14:27 AM »
well, I sometimes have to do my recording 'stealth' because the owner of the venue doesn't like recording even if I have an agreement with the artist that I can record the shows.

And if I would do a (stealth) recording of another show and only use it for personal listening, I see that as making a copy of my own CD for backup / ease of use purposes, not copyright infringement.

What you are talking about is bootlegging: recording a show and selling it. The whole 'taping' community is against that. If they find out on taperssection.com that you're bootlegger, I bet they ban you for life.
Logged

Offline Febs

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2701
Re: what player for recording?
« Reply #14 on: December 19, 2008, 07:04:07 AM »
Quote from: Llorean on December 18, 2008, 09:08:50 AM
I'm sorry, but 'stealth' recording is just another form of Copyright Infringement. If you need to hide your recorder, you aren't supposed to be doing it.

As petur has already noted, this is not true.  I often record my own performances, but hide the recorder simply because, from a purely aesthetic standpoint, it's not something that I want the audience to see.  It's the same reason that we route microphone cables on stage to be as inconspicuous as possible.
Logged
Rockbox Forum Guidelines
The Rockbox Manual
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Please do not send me support questions via PM.

  • Print
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Support and General Use
| |-+  Recording
| | |-+  what player for recording?
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.122 seconds with 14 queries.