Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Rockbox Ports are now being developed for various digital audio players!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Support and General Use
| |-+  Hardware
| | |-+  Battery benchmarks on ipod nano - results
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Battery benchmarks on ipod nano - results  (Read 1760 times)

Offline delt

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Battery benchmarks on ipod nano - results
« on: August 13, 2008, 10:52:19 AM »
Hello all,

In my other thread about batteries, saratoga wrote:

Quote
Don't change the sample rate.  That'll eat up a lot more CPU power and reduce quality since rockbox has to convert it back to 44.1kHz for playback.

This night and the night before, i benchmarked this, and the results are odd: with 44.1KHz mp3's at 128kbps, the player lasts 9:10:47, and with 32KHz mp3's at 80kbps, it lasts 9:48:01. Perhaps because at 44KHz there's more information per second to decode?

I did these tests with the parametric EQ on, but using only the middle band, ie. the 4 other bands have zero gain. For comparing EQ on and off, i did some tests a few days ago, and the EQ does in fact eat up a lot of battery when using all 5 bands.

I don't think it would be such a good idea to copy/paste the entire battery_bench.txt files here, so i put em in my web directory:

http://www.deimos.ca/rockbox/

Hope this helps!
Logged

Offline saratoga

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8974
Re: Battery benchmarks on ipod nano - results
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2008, 11:51:10 AM »
Thats not really surprising.  The CodecPerformanceComparison wiki page says that going from 96k to 128k uses up 8.5MHz, which is certainly more then our linear interpolating resampler uses, so you're mostly just seeing the impact of bitrate on power consumption.
Logged

Offline soap

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1678
  • Creature of habit.
Re: Battery benchmarks on ipod nano - results
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2008, 12:26:54 PM »
Quote from: delt on August 13, 2008, 10:52:19 AM
For comparing EQ on and off, i did some tests a few days ago, and the EQ does in fact eat up a lot of battery when using all 5 bands.
http://www.rockbox.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/IpodRuntime
I would love to see your benchmark test with and without the EQ posted to that wiki page.
Logged
Rockbox Forum Guidelines
The Rockbox Manual
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way

Offline delt

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Battery benchmarks on ipod nano - results
« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2008, 09:55:10 PM »
Okie, just give me a few pointers (i'm a noob when it comes to editing wiki sites)

Quote
linear interpolating resampler

Honestly, even with linear resampling, the sound quality is quite excellent.
Logged

Offline Chronon

  • Rockbox Expert
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4379
Re: Battery benchmarks on ipod nano - results
« Reply #4 on: August 14, 2008, 05:22:12 PM »
Make sure you have a twiki account and write permission.  Choose the "Attach" link at the bottom of the page and click the FileAttachments link under Help for more info.
Logged
Sansa e280, Gigabeat F40, Gigabeat S60, Sansa Clip+, iPod Mini 2g

Offline soap

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1678
  • Creature of habit.
Re: Battery benchmarks on ipod nano - results
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2008, 08:14:07 PM »
Copying the appropriate line above where you are going to insert your entry is your best bet.  Then it is simply a matter of replacing the relevant fields with your info.  Otherwise you really need to pay attention to all the |s, as they are what makes the wiki table.
Logged
Rockbox Forum Guidelines
The Rockbox Manual
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way

  • Print
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Support and General Use
| |-+  Hardware
| | |-+  Battery benchmarks on ipod nano - results
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.084 seconds with 15 queries.