Support and General Use > Hardware

Battery from ipod nano 2g/3g in 1g ...?

<< < (3/3)

soap:

--- Quote from: delt on August 10, 2008, 03:46:24 AM ---
--- Quote ---Its [MPC] pretty similar to MP3.
--- End quote ---
... but uses a lot less CPU, as i understand from your above post?

--- End quote ---
I think he was saying MPC's file sizes are very similar to MP3.  This is true at the commonly accepted "transparent" levels, but MPC performs worse than many others at low bitrates.

delt:
Doing a battery benchmark with 32KHz files. That should take 8-9 hours, tomorrow i'll do the same with 44.1Khz files, same EQ settings etcetc. (i just use the middle band on the eq, all other ones have zero gain)


--- Quote ---Don't change the sample rate.  That'll eat up a lot more CPU power and reduce quality since rockbox has to convert it back to 44.1kHz for playback.
--- End quote ---

I was just wondering, what if the input file is exactly 22050Hz, wouldn't there be an optimization in that case? It would suck having to encode speech, language training, comedy, etc. in full cd quality where it's absolutely not needed.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page