Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Thank You for your continued support and contributions!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  Which lossy codec sounds best in Rockbox?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Which lossy codec sounds best in Rockbox?  (Read 1316 times)

Offline lee321987

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Which lossy codec sounds best in Rockbox?
« on: May 19, 2008, 04:45:52 PM »
   Most of my rips are MP3, but I'm thinking of switching to OGG or MPC.  Any opinions?
Logged
What are you waiting for? You're faster than this. Don't think you are... know you are. -- The Matrix

Offline Febs

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2701
Re: Which lossy codec sounds best in Rockbox?
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2008, 04:58:50 PM »
If you use a good encoder and a sufficiently high bitrate, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, and MPC will all be indistinguishable from the original recording.  Thus, none sounds better than another.

Different people have different sensitivities to encoding artifacts, so it's really impossible to say definitely what a "sufficiently high bitrate" means.  Listening tests have shown that LAME encoded MP3s become indistinguishable from the original for most listeners at about the -V5 setting (approximately 135 kbps VBR), but your results may vary.  The best thing to do is try various samples for yourself and see what you prefer.

Note:  do not transcode your MP3s to another format.  The resulting files will be a lower quality.  If you are going to switch from one format to another, re-encode from the original or from a lossless copy.
Logged
Rockbox Forum Guidelines
The Rockbox Manual
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Please do not send me support questions via PM.

Offline eevan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Which lossy codec sounds best in Rockbox?
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2008, 06:30:35 PM »
Well I use Musepack mostly because it decodes quite efficiently on my c250 (which means more playback time :) )
Logged
If age or weaknes doe prohibyte bloudletting, you must use boxing.
— PHILIP BARROUGH, The Methode of Phisicke (1583)

  • Print
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Rockbox General
| |-+  Rockbox General Discussion
| | |-+  Which lossy codec sounds best in Rockbox?
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.073 seconds with 15 queries.