Rockbox General > Rockbox General Discussion
Battery wasting
TexasRockbox:
--- Quote from: saratoga on October 01, 2007, 05:54:03 PM ---Try it and see what terms they offer you.
--- End quote ---
Has it been tried before and with the results being doors slammed in the face?
scorche:
--- Quote from: TexasRockbox on October 01, 2007, 06:10:55 PM ---Has it been tried before and with the results being doors slammed in the face?
--- End quote ---
Yes, and they haven't even afforded us the dignity of a response. Feel free to continue to bug them though. :)
saratoga:
--- Quote from: scorche on October 01, 2007, 06:24:46 PM ---
--- Quote from: TexasRockbox on October 01, 2007, 06:10:55 PM ---Has it been tried before and with the results being doors slammed in the face?
--- End quote ---
Yes, and they haven't even afforded us the dignity of a response. Feel free to continue to bug them though. :)
--- End quote ---
I don't think anyone tried that link. At least not that I know of. Might be worth filling out the "student" option and seeing if they'd give you any materials under acceptable terms. Probably a long shot though. I don't think Nvidia really cares if people develop for the old PP chips, since they're all but discontinued.
scorche:
/me thought you were talking about email.
TexasRockbox:
Not email. I'm not a student but I would think we would not want to flood nvidia with Rockbox submissions. I could try it but I'm not a student and other "oldtimers" to Rockbox may be better at filling out the partiulars. Maybe a well worded submission might get a response: i.e. we have our working Rockbox firmware under a GPL and has x-number of installations. We would like to take this Rockbox firmware to the next level and work on battery consumption and implementation of options. Thank you for your time and consideration. The developer with the most number of years experience with Rockbox could submit it.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version