Rockbox General > Rockbox General Discussion
more ambitious
soap:
--- Quote from: Llorean on September 19, 2007, 10:50:13 AM ---I agree that laying it out on paper first is important, but a very large part of a good menuing system is "how does it feel when using it?"
--- End quote ---
Llorean, quick and dirty menu testing could be accomplished using a variation of your "directory tree and .cfg files" joke of an idea.
Llorean:
Indeed. Do that in a UI sim, and you have a quick and dirty, drag 'n drop, on-the-fly menu tester.
JdGordon:
--- Quote from: Lear on September 19, 2007, 10:25:30 AM ---Regarding the menu layout, wasn't it the plan that after the introduction of the (no longer not so) new menu/settings handling code (or was it the root menu?), there would be some layout changes, in particular regarding the settings menus, which were moved down in a bit? Not much of that happened... (And no, I don't know what the plan was.)
--- End quote ---
that recode makes rearranging the menu extremely simple (code wise).
arodier:
Sorry if I have upset somebody.
Two remarks.
For the moment, I don't think to have sufficient free time to study the rockbox code core and produce patches. Actually, I keep my free time is for another open source project from myself. Please, don't believe I just came here to post free critics.
I will be very happy to view this project more adopted, and not only by geeks. If interfaces like KDE or Gnome, (or others) have never been created, I'm not sure that Linux adoption would be so important today.
May be a large adoption of rockbox by no powerful users, with help from friends of course, sensibilise them to open source, and open source formats.
GodEater:
And, as expected, someone else with great ideas for Rockbox has come back to us and said "actually I don't have time to do any of this."
Well, that pretty much means it won't get done then. Nothing more to see here. Move along :)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version