Rockbox General > Rockbox General Discussion
more ambitious
AlexP:
--- Quote from: MU4L on September 18, 2007, 05:23:58 PM ---That is to my own detriment, seeing as the largest (non-modified) capacity available on a Rockbox target is 80GB whilst my collection tops 120GB.
--- End quote ---
The Archos hard disk players take 2.5" disks :)
JdGordon:
--- Quote from: arodier on September 18, 2007, 07:56:29 AM ---Reorganize GUI with less menu depth and more logic for users.
--- End quote ---
the title of that is a valid point and has been brought up a few times. the thing is, with over 180 settings, trying to organise them in a logical and simple way isnt very easy... but if a patch came which did it well it wouldnt be ignored.
removing settings is a no-no though (unfortunatly)
saratoga:
If someone wants to try and rework the interface/menus/etc, please submit a patch. No need to fork, we could work on it from the tracker, or if its really that complicated, could commit it as a compile time option.
DefineByte:
Shouldn't an interface/menu system be designed on paper first? Going straight to coding it seems a bit silly.
If someone can think of a 'better' design they should put a design document on the wiki so it can be discussed. Wouldn't that be a good starting point?
AlexP:
--- Quote from: DefineByte on September 19, 2007, 04:58:42 AM ---Shouldn't an interface/menu system be designed on paper first? Going straight to coding it seems a bit silly.
If someone can think of a 'better' design they should put a design document on the wiki so it can be discussed. Wouldn't that be a good starting point?
--- End quote ---
Absolutely. Personally I would love to see some designs, bearing in mind things like access to all settings, no removing settings, easy to navigate for blind users (i.e. voicable) etc etc.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version