Welcome to the Rockbox Technical Forums!
I was already planning to buy the 80gb next week anyways, so cheers to Apple for this one.But without Rockbox, the 160gb is useless. So i'm in a pickle.
iFixit's guide is quite informative about the majority of the hardware components, at the very least. But yes, these look like the very same Samsung SOC chip Apple used in the nano 2G.Translation: Brand spanking new port, and lots of headaches.
edit: there's also a diagnostic mode. Hackable?http://www.flickr.com/photos/ipodlounger/sets/72157601903055437/
Hello, found this on the head-fi forums. A smart bunny opened up a new ipod classic to determine if the layout/DAC is the same as the 5.5g. http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=259258 Hope this helps any devs who might be willing to port rockbox to the new ipods. He seems to know what he's talking about as it's all gibberish to me.
Quote from: scrollop on September 08, 2007, 06:04:20 AMHello, found this on the head-fi forums. A smart bunny opened up a new ipod classic to determine if the layout/DAC is the same as the 5.5g. http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=259258 Hope this helps any devs who might be willing to port rockbox to the new ipods. He seems to know what he's talking about as it's all gibberish to me.No it is pretty much just all nonsense. Such is the way of the head-fi poster.
What part of it do you consider nonsense?
It's not helpful to anyone looking to create a rockbox port, I agree... but what is your reasoning behind calling it nonsense?
Page created in 0.067 seconds with 21 queries.