Support and General Use > Recording

So how about getting the REP into svn?

(1/2) > >>

paulheu:
Last I remembered the Recording Enhancement Pack was not accepted due to some display handling issues before the (failed) 3.0 freeze.

What's the current status of this, I think most of the uncommited parts of this patch are actually useful and should IMO be included..

Could any of the powers that be shed some light on why not and if at all possible tell us what should be done to make it work..

redwood:
hear, hear.....would love to know what if anything is the holdup

linuxstb:
I don't know anything about the contents of the REP, but there are some general requirements for patches to be accepted:

1) They must be posted to flyspray.

2) Where possible, patches should be relatively small and self-contained and do one thing - the REP sounds like lots of patches rolled into one.  IMO these should be submitted for review and acceptance individually.

3) You need to find a developer (or developers) willing to commit these to SVN and take responsibility for any problems they may cause.

petur:
1) it is far from clear what is in the REP to date, I'm trying to sum up:
   - histogram
   - large peakmeters
   - custom button
   - ...

2) so as is evident, it is a lot of different stuff which will never make it in one go (I've been committing parts of it in the past though)

3) some things like the custom button are a bit controversial among the devs and will not make it anyway.

so.. lets do it this way:
1) make the definite list of patches that makes up the REP
2) decide on which ones should make it
3) extract and commit those

paulheu:
I agree with that.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page