Rockbox General > Rockbox General Discussion

Exclude folder from database

<< < (3/3)

bascule:
You could also have a look at this thread:
http://forums.rockbox.org/index.php?topic=11146.0

riffmaker:

--- Quote from: GodEater on July 19, 2007, 05:11:32 PM ---
But if you're using the database, then the file structure is irrelevant - you'll never even see it.


--- End quote ---

But I want to use both...That's my point...

ChangFest:

--- Quote from: GodEater on July 19, 2007, 05:11:32 PM ---
--- Quote from: riffmaker on July 19, 2007, 05:09:16 PM ---I have 80gb 5g iPod so I have no problem with free space as my library is "only" 25gigs big...
I just like my own folder and file name structure...But I dont want to rename all mp3s in iPod libray...What is even good for when I'd had my mp3 in F00-F50 folders?
I just would like to take advantage of my directory structure and ID3tag database....And also left iPod library untouched....

--- End quote ---

But if you're using the database, then the file structure is irrelevant - you'll never even see it.

I guess I just don't understand what you think you're acheiving doing it this way.

--- End quote ---
Exactly. If you're using the Rockbox database on your copied files in the folder structure you want, you're defeating the purpose of what you're trying to achieve (backup). There is no reason as to why you would need to have copies of your music files in a folder structure of your creation and in the iPod's folder structure. Just create the Rockbox database from the files contained in the iPod_Control folder. If you want backups of your music, why backup on the same device? If your iPod HD dies, you'll lose your original and backup files.

soap:

--- Quote from: riffmaker on July 20, 2007, 10:10:38 AM ---But I want to use both...That's my point...[/b[

--- End quote ---
He wants to use both (or should I say all three) options.  How about a little less effort convincing him it's a waste (he explained he has enough space) and a little more attention to if his desires are possible.
If I understand correctly:
1 - He wants to use the stock Apple firmware, and the F'd file structure this requires.
2 - He wants to be able to use Rockbox and navigate by directory structure.  (This already requires two copies of his music.)
3 - He wants to be able to play with Rockbox's database without seeing two copies of every file show up.  Thus he original question - Can he exclude folders from showing up in the database.
While I agree that the idea this serves any form of backup is mistaken, PaulJam and bascule have both offered solutions and it is up to riffmaker to decide the cost:benefit analysis for himself.

Arj:

--- Quote from: GodEater on July 19, 2007, 03:33:35 PM ---I'm at a loss as to why you've bothered with the two copies of music - it'll quite happily work with the music files iTunes has loaded onto your ipod. You don't need the second copy.
--- End quote ---
You may only be referring to his specific situation, but in case you are not: another reason this might come up is if you want to have the same song encoded with two different codecs, perhaps to compare them to see what differences you hear.  For example, I recently selected a few favorite albums and re-encoded them with flac.  I also have them encoded with ogg vorbis.  I was just curious whether I could hear a difference between them, but I need to have both versions on my H-120, but don't want both in my database.  I keep all my music under a top level folder, called Music.  I decided to put the flac files under a separate top level folder, called "flac Music."  I imagine the duplicates are in my database, but my WPS doesn't show them because the view assumes all music is under my original Music folder.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page