Rockbox General > Rockbox General Discussion

Latest Rockbox not working on Nano

<< < (32/34) > >>

GodEater:
No - as has been said many times.

People that want a workaround for this will have to do it themselves. If you wish to provide an unsupported build for those who can't / won't take the time to learn how to do it themselves, then you may host it in the Unsupported Builds forum.

mitchelln:

--- Quote from: GodEater on November 06, 2007, 04:48:30 AM ---No - as has been said many times.

People that want a workaround for this will have to do it themselves. If you wish to provide an unsupported build for those who can't / won't take the time to learn how to do it themselves, then you may host it in the Unsupported Builds forum.

--- End quote ---
Okay. I'll do that. It's been nice to meet such a friendly bunch of people.
Is there a thread that discusses the clock rate change from 75 to 80MHz and why it was done?
Thanks!

pixelma:
There already is one that provides this in the unsupported builds forum... ;) It seems to be updated in regular intervals as well.

Search is your friend.

GodEater:

--- Quote from: mitchelln on November 06, 2007, 04:55:48 AM ---Is there a thread that discusses the clock rate change from 75 to 80MHz and why it was done?
Thanks!

--- End quote ---

Yes. This one.

See this post : http://forums.rockbox.org/index.php?topic=11504.msg100225#msg100225

mitchelln:

--- Quote from: pixelma on November 06, 2007, 05:33:59 AM ---There already is one that provides this in the unsupported builds forum... ;) It seems to be updated in regular intervals as well.

Search is your friend.

--- End quote ---
I can't actually find why the clock was upped to 80MHz. Was it based on a paper spec or reverse engineering, for example?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version