Welcome to the Rockbox Technical Forums!
. . . or the bass/treble settings (which are in hardware, and won't use any CPU).
Quote from: Nik on July 09, 2007, 06:27:08 PMSince you say those graphs look normal then nvm... it seems like nobody here believe me. It's not placebo effects if it sounds obviously better on Apple FW. How do you know if it is not placebo effect if you haven't AB them blindly? Also, as safetydan said, you have the music on louder in Apple's OF- the general masses tend to equate louder with better.Charles
Since you say those graphs look normal then nvm... it seems like nobody here believe me. It's not placebo effects if it sounds obviously better on Apple FW.
It's not placebo effects if it sounds obviously better on Apple FW.
I'm not stupid you know, some things you don't have to measure them using a digital software to know the difference.
Sorry that I misunderstood you charles.
the sound becomes distorted at the lower volume than the iPod FW. (before and after I change the settings)
Whats WPS?Anyway I done the test on Rightmark but what am I suppose to do now? I'll just post 2 graphs which I think make sense.The quality for this file is 223 kbps VBR...http://img412.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dynamical9.pnghttp://img164.imageshack.us/my.php?image=noiseaf0.png
Quote from: Nik on July 10, 2007, 02:19:38 AMSorry that I misunderstood you charles.No problem.Quotethe sound becomes distorted at the lower volume than the iPod FW. (before and after I change the settings)What is your setting in "Settings"-> "Sound Settings"-> "Volume"?Charles
Quote from: Nik on July 09, 2007, 08:11:13 AMWhats WPS?Anyway I done the test on Rightmark but what am I suppose to do now? I'll just post 2 graphs which I think make sense.The quality for this file is 223 kbps VBR...http://img412.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dynamical9.pnghttp://img164.imageshack.us/my.php?image=noiseaf0.pngThese graphs aren't labelled. What exactly are you measuring here? And what file are you using to do the measurements? RMAA has a set of test files that you should use that will allow you to measure frequency response.
At around -20dB, the bass is distorted (default settings).
Rather than including two recordings where we have no idea what you've set the config file to, why don't you A) Do an actual blind test or B) provide an original (not recorded from the player) sample clip where the difference is "obvious", if we listen to it in both firmwares, as you put it, so someone else here with a Nano can also do a test, and their own RMAA.
Quote from: Febs on July 10, 2007, 04:27:44 AMQuote from: Nik on July 09, 2007, 08:11:13 AMWhats WPS?Anyway I done the test on Rightmark but what am I suppose to do now? I'll just post 2 graphs which I think make sense.The quality for this file is 223 kbps VBR...http://img412.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dynamical9.pnghttp://img164.imageshack.us/my.php?image=noiseaf0.pngThese graphs aren't labelled. Â What exactly are you measuring here? Â And what file are you using to do the measurements? Â RMAA has a set of test files that you should use that will allow you to measure frequency response.First one is dynamic range, 2nd one is noise level.
Quote from: Nik on July 09, 2007, 08:11:13 AMWhats WPS?Anyway I done the test on Rightmark but what am I suppose to do now? I'll just post 2 graphs which I think make sense.The quality for this file is 223 kbps VBR...http://img412.imageshack.us/my.php?image=dynamical9.pnghttp://img164.imageshack.us/my.php?image=noiseaf0.pngThese graphs aren't labelled. Â What exactly are you measuring here? Â And what file are you using to do the measurements? Â RMAA has a set of test files that you should use that will allow you to measure frequency response.
Page created in 0.098 seconds with 21 queries.