Support and General Use > Hardware

N3: An open source portable audio player

<< < (3/7) > >>

Bagder:

--- Quote from: may1937 on June 16, 2007, 12:40:18 PM ---The neat thing about dm320, is most of the "hard" software work is done, at least for the Linux side. And since it's mostly an ARM, I wouldn't think getting Rockbox running would be too difficult.

--- End quote ---

Rockbox has no pieces of Linux in it and Rockbox currently doesn't run on any dm320 target...

For my views on the dm320 arch, I posted some on the Neuros-DM320 list:

http://groups.google.com/group/Neuros-DM320Hardware/browse_thread/thread/b64fa011bc2c22b5

ZincAlloy:

--- Quote from: may1937 on June 16, 2007, 12:26:10 PM ---Yes, we were hoping that by supporting high quality audio input and output, it might appeal to a more "audiophile" type crowd. And maybe some tapers could replace more complex setups with a single device. Storage is important, of course, but due to cost we may have to settle for 4/8GB of flash, at least initially.

--- End quote ---

I don't think 4/8 GB of storage would appeal to the "audiophile type crowd".

GodEater:

--- Quote from: ZincAlloy on June 17, 2007, 06:44:03 AM ---I don't think 4/8 GB of storage would appeal to the "audiophile type crowd".

--- End quote ---

I agree - having such a tiny amount of storage would make this extremely un-interesting for me.

Llorean:
How would using a CompactFlash drive for storage compare? Still flash, they can offload the cost of large storage on the purchaser, and more flexible for the user?

may1937:

--- Quote from: Bagder on June 16, 2007, 04:01:39 PM ---Rockbox has no pieces of Linux in it and Rockbox currently doesn't run on any dm320 target...

--- End quote ---

I realize Rockbox does not use Linux, my point was that we already have a bootstrapped software environment for the hardware, including source. Surely, that would help a Rockbox port?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version