Support and General Use > Theming and Appearance Customization
Organizing the wiki page:WpsIpod5g
bascule:
--- Quote from: bluebrother on May 01, 2007, 01:36:24 AM ---There are plenty of free hosting services around so I think this could be considerated.
--- End quote ---
Yes, but they are mostly rubbish and/or full of spammy adverts.
As the custom builds are hosted, I see absolutely no reason why custon WPS's should not also be hosted.
Nate!:
Just my two cents: I agree with Bascule:
--- Quote from: Bascule ---As the custom builds are hosted, I see absolutely no reason why custon WPS's should not also be hosted.
--- End quote ---
I know there are minimalists that use rockbox, to each his own. But, Custom WPSs are a sought-after feature. Since custom builds are hosted, WPS that are created for those builds should be hosted also.
EvilG's idea of organization is great. Sort of like the rockbox-themes page, except maybe clearly define in bold that a specific build/patch is needed.
I guess, since it is a wiki, EvilG can make the changes. If there are any objections, the Admins can roll back to the previous revision.
Maybe sections like:
Official build customs:
The following WPSs will display correctly using the official build rxxxxx-Date.
WPS.wps
EvilG Fusion/J build:
The following WPSs will not display correctly unless you download the current x build.
Senab build:
The following WPSs will not display correctly unless you download the current x build.
Llorean:
We could just stop hosting custom builds. ;)
bluebrother:
--- Quote from: Llorean on May 01, 2007, 04:54:15 PM ---We could just stop hosting custom builds. ;)
--- End quote ---
Where do we host custom builds? I only know about the forum threads, and those link to external sites that hold the custom builds itself.
Or did I miss something here?
soap:
--- Quote from: Nate! on May 01, 2007, 11:00:07 AM ---EvilG Fusion/J build:
 The following WPSs will not display correctly unless you download the current x build.
Senab build:
 The following WPSs will not display correctly unless you download the current x build.
--- End quote ---
No.
This is part of what we need to move away from.
There is no WPS out there which relies on the brightness patch from Senab's build.
There are not WPSs out there which rely on the one click to insert, plugin backlight always on, or random album select patchs from evilG's build.
We should not be associating WPSs with builds, but rather with features. Features which may or may not be part of "stock" Rockbox by the time some future gallery visitor is reading the WPS description.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version