Rockbox.org home
Downloads
Release release
Dev builds dev builds
Extras extras
themes themes
Documentation
Manual manual
Wiki wiki
Device Status device status
Support
Forums forums
Mailing lists mailing lists
IRC IRC
Development
Bugs bugs
Patches patches
Dev Guide dev guide
Search



Donate

Rockbox Technical Forums


Login with username, password and session length
Home Help Search Staff List Login Register
News:

Thank You for your continued support and contributions!

+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Support and General Use
| |-+  User Interface and Voice
| | |-+  changes to the Gigabeat button mappings

Poll

How would you like the buttons to be mapped?

other (don't choose this if you just want SELECT and A to be changed in the WPS)
3 (15%)
as they are now
15 (75%)
as they were before but A to shutdown
1 (5%)
other (don't choose this if you just want SELECT and A to be changed in the WPS)
1 (5%)

Total Members Voted: 20

« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings  (Read 9892 times)

Offline markun

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 462
changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« on: April 28, 2007, 12:17:17 PM »
I changed the button mappings yesterday and basically switched POWER and A to prevent accidental shutdown when holding POWER to do a key combo (for doing a pagedown for example: POWER+DOWN).

Now I'm not so sure it was the best solution. Someone suggested we could also fix it by making A the shutdown button and leaving the layout as it was before, but I though it was a bit weird because that's what you would expect from the POWER button (because of the icon on the button)

So, what are your opinions on it?
Logged

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2007, 12:23:15 PM »
I think the idea to make one button turn it on (the button labelled "Power" on the unit) and a different button turn it off is incredibly counterintuitive.

People who don't like the possibility of their button maps being changed shouldn't use pre-release software.
Logged

Offline copskid44

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #2 on: April 28, 2007, 01:06:36 PM »
I think he has something.

POWER
Turn On - Hold
Menu

A Button
Mute and move to menu
Turn Off - Hold

Logged

Offline johnson4

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 62
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2007, 03:47:44 PM »
 Thank you Thank you Thank you
I was so annoyed by the accidental shut-down, this is much better.
My biggest problem was with moving the cursor in the text-editor, I'm very thankful
« Last Edit: April 29, 2007, 08:16:05 PM by johnson4 »
Logged

Offline copskid44

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2007, 06:30:12 PM »
what! ive never accidentally shut my gigabeat down! I maybe am stubborn but I still hate it.

Could someone make a patch to where it changes it back so I dont have to change the code every time i update?
Logged

Offline markun

  • Developer
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 462
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2007, 05:26:18 AM »
If you've downloaded the source with svn it's very easy to make your own patch. After changing it the way you want, you go to the root of the source tree and do "svn diff > old_buttons.patch".
Logged

Offline mannequin

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2007, 12:59:42 PM »
markun,

thanks for the changes. it was very uncomfortable to page scroll or use the text editor with the old mappings due to the accident shutdown issue.

however, we have the VOL buttons idling most of the time. wouldn't it be a good idea to use them for page and text editor scrolling?
Logged

Offline johnson4

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 62
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2007, 01:30:26 PM »
Quote from: mannequin on April 30, 2007, 12:59:42 PM

however, we have the VOL buttons idling most of the time. wouldn't it be a good idea to use them for page and text editor scrolling?
I like the sounds of that too
Logged

Offline lights0ut

  • Artist
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 382
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2007, 02:56:03 PM »
I just got an F40, but I've used both buttonmappings, I like the new one better because it seems to be more intuitive. I don't use the paged list scrolling function because I have my music quite organised, but if I did, I could see where I'd get the accidental shutdown (database browsing, right?). I always thought the power button shouldn't be used to go back to the filebrowser/wps, that's not what a power button does.
Just my thoughts, and thanks for the changes. ;)
Logged

Offline Nate!

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 235
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2007, 03:43:03 PM »
Ooh, good idea.  I second or third that request to use the VOL rocker for paged scrolling and text editing.
Logged

Offline lights0ut

  • Artist
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 382
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #10 on: May 01, 2007, 11:27:17 PM »
Doesn't having the vol. buttons always on volume function mean that one could change the volume from anywhere on the player? I like this functionality, but I could see where using the vol buttons as paging scrollers it would aid those with very long lists. Maybe a new setting is in order?
Logged

Offline Mad Cow

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 445
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #11 on: May 02, 2007, 08:22:07 AM »
I changed the mappings to have the volume buttons for paged scrolling a while ago because it was similar to how the H10 does it. IMO it's much better than using them to change the volume from the menus.
Logged
iRiver H10 5GB, Gigabeat F40, Gigabeat S60, all rockboxed. :P

Offline ilikedirt

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2007, 08:52:05 AM »
I don't quite like the new mapping. It makes using the player with one hand a whole lot harder and pushing the A button when the player is in the dock is fiddly too.

I did not know, that the page-scroll was on power-up/down so I never experienced accidential shutdowns - but now that I know that would propably be a problem with the old layout ;) So I do not know, what would be the best solution, either, but I still prefer the old layout.
Logged

Offline Llorean

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12931
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2007, 08:54:25 AM »
I'm still of the opinion that in the WPS, A should be play/pause, and 'select' should go back to the filetree. It brings back easy (easier at least) one handed operation, and brings the target in line with the other targets in regards to button map consistency between screens.

With that, you can then, from WPS, using only the cross, insert and manipulate the playlist. Getting back to the WPS is slightly harder (Hold left, then tap left once, then choose the Now Playing entry) than a single button press, but you get the added functionality, and the cross-platform consistency of not having a button change functions between screens (change functions relative to the other targets, that is).
Logged

Offline Nate!

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 235
Re: changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2007, 10:03:04 AM »
Now I understand.  Uniformity is the desired goal.  I was thinking what Llorean described was an attempt to get the Gigabeat to behave like the iriver platforms.  This didn't seem right since some of the Gigabeat community have only had the Toshiba device and have grown accustom to its navigation style.  (Hence my feature request for the addition of the sliding cross navigation.)  But, I for one, do admire how Rockbox works for a miriad of platforms and Rockbox on one device operates much the same way as Rockbox on another.

Like I've mentioned before, the new mapping took just a few minutes to get used to so changing it again wouldn't be a big deal.  (For Me anyway)

Although, can we get a dev to revisit the sliding cross navigation feature request? ;) lol
Logged

  • Print
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »
+  Rockbox Technical Forums
|-+  Support and General Use
| |-+  User Interface and Voice
| | |-+  changes to the Gigabeat button mappings
 

  • SMF 2.0.17 | SMF © 2019, Simple Machines
  • Rockbox Privacy Policy
  • XHTML
  • RSS
  • WAP2

Page created in 0.128 seconds with 21 queries.