Thank You for your continued support and contributions!
Quote from: marc2003 on May 04, 2010, 07:27:05 PMright, my battery test has just finshed. 14h21m in the end.sansa clip8gb v2r25799ogg q5, 11 track album, avg 143kbpscpu boostedvolume -14 test repeated with back light on: 9h39many other tests you want doing, give us a shout. i'm not much use for anything else. :/
right, my battery test has just finshed. 14h21m in the end.sansa clip8gb v2r25799ogg q5, 11 track album, avg 143kbpscpu boostedvolume -14
I did a back to back listening test with the earlier build and the sound is different (to my ears) than the stock OS. I won't go as far as saying I am an audiophile but I think I have a good pair of ears...without wanting to use adjectives, the sound on the stock OS was a bit 'warmer' and perhaps a bit more forward. This does not mean it is better, just different. Of course I could be imagining it. I haven't compared later builds because I don't care to boot into the original OS since I have got used to the Rockbox sound and the features are SOOOOO much better than the original OS.
With the 2nd patch you will need to update the bootloader from SVN, come on IRC if you don't feel confident with doing it
should be fixed for good with r25890
Quote from: funman on May 07, 2010, 03:10:14 AMWith the 2nd patch you will need to update the bootloader from SVN, come on IRC if you don't feel confident with doing itoh FFS. i can't even read. i totally missed the part in bold. i only applied the first patch. :/having said that, i still got 15h22m which is an extra hour. i'll try the 2nd patch later.
Quote from: funman on May 07, 2010, 03:59:22 PMshould be fixed for good with r25890Sorry, but I can't hear any difference with r25894. Volume is still considerably lower than on the OF (without the EU volume cap and with all replaygain, EQ settings etc. turned off on both)
UPDATE: while unboosted playback on r258614 - r25869 was perfectly stable for me, I get frequent crashes again with r25894 (including "temporary bricks"!)... there must have been some changes made between -69 and -94 which result in the same situation as in r25799.
Undefined instruction at 3004996C
Data abortat 30049DECFSR 0x8(domain 0, fault 8)address 0xE3530044
Undefined instruction at 3002496C
Page created in 0.23 seconds with 64 queries.