Welcome to the Rockbox Technical Forums!
I might explore some of the advantages of AVR32 over the atmel arm9 board. The ngw100 board makes a sound choice for now. I can mark up an AVR32 64-TQFP (at32uc3b chip) with an adapter into a project. It just has full speed usb and 60 MHz max. frequency. For now, it looks to be my better choice, sorry guys. The ngw100 board is $73 usd from mouser and many specs that I'm looking for in a learning project and still uses the same tool chain. Very useful, hope you agree.
2. We are a little bit stuck at the moment getting the rockbox bootloader to work on the dev board if there are any AT91 developers out there that might be able to help we would appreciate some guidance.
I'd like to repeat here what I've repeated in the IRC channel for the last times this target has been discussed:If you guys would simply produce good patches against current Rockbox SVN and post them, like in the patch tracker, you'd get much more people who'd read your work and who'd easily could try out building the stuff for your target. And possibly help out fixing flaws in your build setup, lds scripts, makefiles, crt0.S files or whatever.
Unfortunately I don't know how to do patches nor how to post them - but I think Tom may know that so I would ask him to do it.
example: http://www.mingw.org/
Hello everyone I have no programming experience but have been folllowing this thread with a great deal of interest for a while. I have a friend who works in the engineering dept at freescale if you are still considering the freescale processors I will see what might be available thru him. (information programming hard ware etc.)
This is so great, I was wondering if anyone was trying to do something as crazy as trying to build i'ts own hardware for rockbox and I found out that you are. I myself only have some small experience of programming 8-bit pics to control servos and leds so I don't know if I could be of much help but i would love to see rockbox running on open hardware and I would definently buy one! Keep up the good work and merry christmas!
Why do you have so many pages at your Google code site that either duplicate, for example, how to set up the development environment, or simply contain information that should be hosted on the Rockbox wiki?
Why not chart your progress on the wiki here, where it can more easily be in the site of other interested Rockbox developers?
Is your intent to create a new project, or actually work on Rockbox?
Page created in 0.448 seconds with 17 queries.