Rockbox Ports are now being developed for various digital audio players!
I'm thinking it has something to do with the boot loader.
I've also noticed that by holding select and viewing the loading process, the CRCs are different from when I turn it on by battery vs plugged in...
Quote from: MGSoto on April 15, 2009, 08:11:44 PMI'm thinking it has something to do with the boot loader.Isn't this what I just told you?
Quote from: MGSoto on April 15, 2009, 08:11:44 PM I've also noticed that by holding select and viewing the loading process, the CRCs are different from when I turn it on by battery vs plugged in...It would be surprising if the OF and rockbox binaries had the same CRCs!
Well, yes, I'm just not sure how using a patch that appears to modify the rockbox source files somehow manages to modify the bootloader as well. Unless I completely missed something in Filespray and I'm not looking at the right patch.
I was assuming that the boot loader attempts to load rockbox, fails, and then falls back to the OF.
Well I'm not sure what patch you're looking at, but the bootloader is part of the rockbox source (see the /bootloader folder). Hopefully you're looking at the recent patch proposed (but not accepted) for 3.2 that changes the bootloaders to boot rockbox on USB insert.
No, it never tries to load rockbox. The current bootloader defaults to the OF on USB insert (you can see this yourself by plugging in a USB cable, you'll end up in the OF not Rockbox).
I was actually talking about the patch itself, it doesn't touch the bootloader folder. (6654 for patch in question)
Page created in 0.144 seconds with 21 queries.